Søgeresultater

I'm interested , I'll add you up. I'm open for anyone else who might be interested into commissioning an artist btw

Oprindeligt skrevet af Garro:

I'm actually glad that we're going back to using mana and stepping away from this stupid spender/generator trend arpg's are going down these days

This, 100%.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Niizuki:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Garro:

I'm actually glad that we're going back to using mana and stepping away from this stupid spender/generator trend arpg's are going down these days

I hate the spender / generator style. ButI believe there could be third way, as i said, more tactical use.

What's more tactical and strategic than harsh mana breakpoints that make you think about how you use your skills and later on how you build and equip your character, assuming that heavy trade-off stats like the one that reduces energy cost on skills.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Supreme Admiral Brenton:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Raesha Moondancer:

You lost the argument, seeing that you are choosing to argue about the content of my persona. Your claims were refuted and shut down, its fine to say you simply liked him and would of liked to see him more, but your initial post was inmensively arrogant, as if your opinion was absolute and obvious for all to see. I engaged accordingly, you get what you give, if the reflection on the mirror seems ugly, its because it is your own reflection.

God forbid people dont make sweeping statments and expect no retort or argument in turn for their bold claims. Cant have my ideas challenged! I am always right!!! No? You disagree!? you probably never go outside!!!!

The steam forums never fail to entertain.

I dislike using "lost" or "won" for arguments, but its the only recourse when facing people who see an argument as a fight to be won, rather than a chance to expand one's mind. When you made the post your mind was made, wich is why you made a sweeping statment, it adds to the irony when your vision is challenged, and you act in turn.

How did i lose the argument? At what point did you argue that the mothod of his death and circumstance as a JOKE was correct?

At what point was my first post arrogant? My opinion of the game HAS changed. My opinion of the devs HAS changed. My opinion of abe and jannet MOST CERTAINLY has changed...

"I dislike using lost or wan for arguments" Proceeds to say "haha you lost" as the very first words. Saying you've won and i lost doesn't make it true dude... It just makes it even more evident that you're a sad enough individual to resort to such things and continue mocking other people for it... Yeesh.

Attacking someone's persona is a good indicator of your words having no substance and nothing to fall back on.

The initial post was made on a sweeping way as if everyone was going to arrive on the same conclusion, if you cannot see it, then i cannot help you.

Man the logic fails are strong with you, its like im watching your ADHD brain break apart in real time. I stated i disliked doing that- because i did that earlier on the post, if X then Y logic seems to not fit in your skull. Its impressive.

I am enjoying the multitude of female characters I can interact with. There is some grinding to develop them, but it is acceptable and not too excessive. I want to get to the fun part, but I also enjoy the story. You are navigating the fine line of maintaining the story line and advancing the sexual situations well.
What I hope to see is the availability to hook up with past partners again, and maybe try something new with them. Too many take the easy way out and just give you a gallery to repeat the same thing. Now, don't get me wrong, it does not have to be for every single person, but I am sure the story has a select few that are closer to the MC than most.
I hope You also plan to allow us to use out humanoid form for such interactions if it is possible.
Thanks for allow us this opportunity and I look forward to your continued development and unavoidable success. :)

Oprindeligt skrevet af Фрунзенская:

кормят нас говном, а мы хаваем

ряльн

you forgot john cancerous rodent and john very cancerous rodent and john mysterious druid knight and john & owl and john big johninator

.. I want pigs and farm !

If you understand that it's to accommodate cyberarms, you are halfway there.
It's economy, like everything.

It's easier to have every set of sleeves rolled up, in every case... Than to make versions where some are rolled up, but some are rolled down.
Why make 500 separate versions of tops to allow for up or down sleeves, when you can just make the original 250 and assume that everyone will install arm cyberware?

And yes, Valden21 is also correct.
Cyberpunk is all about the 1980's vibe, rolled up sleeves were big. Like B.I.G. big. Some jackets didn't even roll down at all and we're stitched that way even.
The tabletop debuted in 1988 after all, in America.

you need 1

Thx