安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題已被鎖定 
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
How detect wallhack.
1) Sometimes wallhack try kill all thru walls like this walls not present, if this kills many many this is wallhack
2) if i use assasin but user always know where i am from any distance
3) user stat - i have 2000 setting bomb for 40000 kill in demolition, all cheaters that i know have less than 1000 setting bomb for 40000 kills (sometimes about 100-200) - it not for ban just for check user
4) wallhack user can detect assasin user thru wall
or you think people report cheaters because they simply play better? people try report me about 10 times from 1000 games (but my stat better in 80% games) and people try report real cheaters in game 900 times from 1000 games so i think its not problem false positive report, because report its not ban - its user say i think this user cheater - so check this user - dont say me about how you can detect aimbot its not funny, how computer can detect voice or face - you need work about it if it your work
-You keep assuming only cheaters are going to be reported. Didn't even cross your head that EVERYBODY will be sending reports left and right? Cheaters reporting non cheaters, noobs reporting people that pwns them, angry players reporting everyone. All those reports need to be EQUALLY reviewed.
-You want to award bans based on 'how it looks', you don't realize how flimsy is that to deny someone the access to their money bought games..
-You step into your own argument by admitting cheats can be UNWILLINGLY SET UPON YOU. Ergo you can be banned because you look invulnerable in a video thanks to someone else cheating. Congrats, you just banned half the MW3 population that did not cheat but joined a modded lobby (Because, can you tell who is HOSTING a modded lobby by watching a video?)
I propose you something. Go to Youtube, Search 'Modern warfare 3' and start watching one and every video on the list. Then mark the player as cheater, or non cheater. For 8 hours, during a whole week.
For every one you miss, You owe Steam $1 (In compensation for screwing things up and banning an innocent), and have to review the video again to correct your decission.
For every correct ban you earn nothing (because it's your job)
At the end of the month count how many money you've paid due to screwups.
That analogy simply doesn't work...or it does if you change the baby to a loud-mouth drunken jerk ruining the flight and the lack of admins (air stewards) not banning the jerk (presumably by throwing him out of the plane).
Also, I think it is high time that the "VAC Discussion" section had a "COD/MW3" sub section where all these posts get moved. Would be very interesting, and would highlight just how bad the game is.
It's not like one can find game specific help requests on the Suggestion area, TF2 suggestions in the Help & tips sections or complains about a VAC ban on the general discussion area...
Yes. Thank you very much for asking.
My point is that ALSO having VAC related MW2/MW3 posts moved to a subsection would emphasize how bad the games are and maybe, just maybe, stop a number of people wasting their money on future adminless games.
and as for anyone blaming the game again NO! VAC agreed to provide the security iof they were happy with the game's set up then they have no excuse it says right on the game page VALVE ANTI CHEAT! VAC is responsable for security and our safe gaming experience no one else!
The problem is far more complex than you imagine.
If you think that if MW3 used PB, ESL, ESEA, nProtect, Warden, etc things would be different you are sadly mistaken
An as I indicated popular games are going to attract the money and cheater base. So usin backlight is a fairly poor example.
thats because 1. they're 80% but-hurt kids lol and 2. the lag in that game is beyond a joke if your on the right side of it no hack could compare to the advantage you'l have in that game i used to think those players with a 100+ kills were cheats till i played a ♥♥♥ server you dont even rnder on there screen till its too late but thats why you favourate swervers who kick high ping players. BF3 does have cheats ocourse but seldome seen and naturaly raved about on the forums. BUT NOT comparable to MW3 where youl find one in every single game you join not even close.
I never saw anyone flying round with dual LMGs in battlefield 3, ever.