Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
first and foremost, vac banned cheater is not supposed to post here about being banned! ever! lol. This forum is meant to discuss VAC as an anti cheat solution and its effectiveness. there are 1 out of maybe 100? maybe 1000 threads that actually are on topic and extolling virtues of vac effectiveness vs other anti cheat solutions.
really, the admin/mod should just close cheater begging thread and just say 'sorry you are in wrong forum, you may not discuss such here.' and then ban if they make another post.
but, they get tired of doing this process, so I think they are more lenient towards innocent players as well, as regular players are rightfully angry at bad cheaters, and are joyful when a cheater is banned forever, losing entire inventory, and crying about it.
(i secretly believe VAC devs print and add such threads to their wall in coffee break room to laugh at cheaters expressing remorse...i would. war trophys lol)
The main reason i come here is to help stop the false rumors about 'vac effectiveness'. very important to stop new players from thinking 'oh i can cheat any time i want.'
CSGO is a difficult game, because it has the 'realistic death' and you die quickly when shot, so new players often dont have proper reaction speed or tactics and search for an easy way to get good. If a cheater tricks them into thinking cheating is undetected, a new player is wasted and instead becomes a cheat addict.
In most experience, players here just respond with normal 'view faq' response. its generally the emotional cheater crying they are losing their inventory that starts the argument or the fight.
I really have a difficult time viewing normal forum poster, who has no vac ban, less favourably, than a confirmed cheater, banned by VAC, who actively seeks to ruin your game experience in new ways, every day.
VAC bans carry a stigma and rightly so.
Sure, there are people who say "lol owned cheater xd" but those are few and far between
See? This is why people have to be blunt. Your ban is a decade old and you still think it's false?
Zero my dude, you just set a new low on this forum
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/3183487594838103910/
The way cheaters look "innocent" are just liars trying to explain their bans because VAC is an automated system and systems don't care about human feelings.
https://steamcommunity.com/app/42710/discussions/0/35222218764206029/
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/458606877330355221/
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/350542683199055472/
https://steamcommunity.com/app/730/discussions/0/392185054116665853/
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/2974028351332365818/
https://steamcommunity.com/app/730/discussions/0/412447524178564568/
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/3183487594838103910/
That's nine threads, including this one. How many more do you think you can make before you get your account in serious trouble?
i mean, it is pretty fun to say this lol.
LOL i was tricked again!
YOU ARE A LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.LIAR.
and you start fights.
and thats why people are rude to you.
would you like to follow me for more social tips? I can also teach you how to not cheat, too!
So that means it's more of a bluntness, rather bullying? I could've sworn that bullying was the literal meaning for this discussion. But thanks for heads up about it's more of a bluntness, rather buylling.