Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
It is documented on many websites (wikipedia included) that VAC has banned many accounts that weren't cheating. I've seen it myself from just 1 account here and there to thousands of accounts when the MW2 ban wave hit. But these accounts were unbanned within a few days.
I don't deny that VAC makes mistakes, I've seen it happen and it will happen again in the future. But I'm also confident enough in Valve to audit the bans frequently and to unban those that were wrongly banned.
Should it ever be revealed that Valve were not investigating bans properly or were knowingly not unbanning accounts it would be a massive scandal for them. It would cost a lot of money and damage their reputation.
We do not disclose the cheats that were detected while connected to a VAC secured server that resulted in a VAC ban. We have detailed records for each VAC ban, however, releasing this information would only benefit cheat developers. The VAC team regularly investigates claims of false VAC bans to increase the effectiveness of Valve Anti-Cheat.
If a VAC ban is issued incorrectly it will be automatically removed by our servers.
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=4044-QDHJ-5691&l=english#reason
Unwritten Rules of Conduct
Within any online community there are a set of common sense rules that should always be followed. Typically they fall into multiple categories of the previous sets of rules.
Unwritten Rules
Do not post any of the following:
VAC Bans are permanent: Do not ask to be unbanned
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=143962136
All of these unban threads aren't supposed to be here.....not our fault people refuse to read rules.
This forum is for VAC discussion, not ban appeals.
Fair enough.
The problem is, how would it ever be revealed? They are the only ones that seem to know.
and...
https://web.archive.org/web/20170518101403/http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showpost.php?p=33811431&postcount=36
Yes, Valve claims that they do no disclose information based on benefiting cheaters, yet something can be said that giving no information to the potential victim is equally as bad, because if such a flag was never investigated by Valve, there would be nobody else to look into it.
To be fair, you are given conflicted statements. One saying that VAC bans cannot be lifting by Steam support, and another that states that you must make Steam support aware of the issue; And given the fact that there could be false flagging out there, users would understandably be pissed.
To me, Valve seems to be overextended. Too many users are on Steam for the number of employees they have, (last I checked it would around 300-400), and this is for everything regarding Steam, not just VAC. I have suspicions that given all VAC games out there that are still updated, only a handful of VAC people are actually involved with it.
I guess there has to be some element of trust between Valve and the consumer just like with almost any company/government or whatever else you can think of.
Like I said I've been around the VAC forums for a long time and I've seen your average Joe get unbanned. If Valve are capable of investigating and reversing his ban I'm confident enough they do it for the rest.
Slightly related, but here is a thread from last year where a person came to these discussions claiming to be falsely banned. Turns out he was right and his ban was removed.
https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/9/3315110799620432332/
It's not conflicting. It means exactly what it says. Support cannot remove bans but you should make them aware if you think your ban is a mistake. Support will forward your concerns to the VAC team.
"....and another that states that you must make Steam support aware of the issue"
i said no such thing, nor does it say that anywhere, because Steam Support cannot remove VAC bans.
Get out of game and start reading.
It's valid advice and users should contact Support if they feel their ban is a mistake.
The link you gave me contained the following information:
I've been VAC banned
VAC bans are permanent, non-negotiable, and cannot be removed by Steam Support.
But yet if you believe you are falsely VAC banned, you are told to direct yourself to Steam Support to make them aware of the issue.
The actual end to that story is, the ban is correct.
Correct bans outweigh false positives....every regular here knows this.
Maybe, maybe not. We do not have sufficient evidence for this. The VAC team could get the request via Steam support, could be hours, days, weeks; We don't know. We also don't know how many reports were about VAC. It could in the hundreds, thousands.
Investigating these, in combination with the low staff and amount of games, makes me really question how trustworthy they actually are. I understand that it will hurt them economically (though I doubt with a distribution platform as massive as Steam, it'd hardly put a dent in it). But rather at the fact that the work isn't being done, the investigation on the false flag never happened, or that it was abandoned entirely.
I'm also seeing the same people month after month in Left 4 Dead 2 consistently evade VAC on secured servers, it looks like these priorities are focused on more demanding games instead, this tells me they're lacking in people.
On a scale as big as Steam and as dis-informational as Valve, the same can be said to the system.
L4D2 is an old game now and generates little revenue for Valve. CSGO and DOTA are the big players these days and it's in Valves interest to focus their energy on these titles over the others. Valve isn't going to hire a big group of devs for each and every game that uses VAC. They are a business afterall and a business needs to make money. Hiring extra people to work on detecting cheats for a game with a small userbase compared to others isn't exactly the best choice.
Neither you, me or anyone else here knows how the VAC team investigate bans. To assume it's down to staff or that bans are manually checked or whatever is simply guess work. It might be that way, or it might be that a system that has been in existence for 10+ years actually has a fairly quick and streamlined method for dealing with what could be hundreds of potential support requests each day.