安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
Standard IQs have increased steadily over time since the 1930s
You're also comparing $60 in todays dollars with those in the 80s. Standard of living costs have given people especially since the 80s significantly more disposable income than previously possible. Thus not only have costs increased by dipsosable income has increased and thus allowing for higher pricing of items.
All your post is saying is that YOU don't like particular kind of game. Which is fine for you but it has little bearing on whether the generation is getting 'dumber'. All it means is that you don't like modern games.
And really? Bad story and linear? Please tell me how any games of old were not BOTH of those a good 80% of the time. You have nostalgia glasses on. That's it.
Your question was 'is today's generation getting dumber'. IQ tests from the 30s onward show this is not the case.
Your question was not about 'respect' and your OP doesn't even mention it.
Then get off my damned lawn, kiddo. There are plenty of Steam users who've been gaming since before you could walk. :P
My first games were Pong, Donkey Kong, Space Invaders and writing my own choose your own adventure games in BASIC.
What awesome story did Metroid have? I can assure you in the original Japanese the story wasn't great. The only 'gotcha' was if you did the perfect ending and found out Samus was a girl. But the 'story' was non-existant.
HL was linear. It's a great game but don't pretend it wasn't 'linear'. It had miniscule load tiems because it broek up the game into tiny tiny micro levels.
Why should they? Those of us who started gaming in the late 70s and early 80s wouldn't go back if you paid us. PC Gaming today is light years ahead of where we came from.
You're apparently not keeping track
2012
Dishonored
Walking Dead
Xcom Enemy Unknown
2011
Skyrim
Batman Arkham Asylum
Portal2
Uncharted 3
Deus Ex : HR
2010
Heavy Rain
Red Dead Redemption
Mass Effect 2
There are plenty of great games coming out. You choose to ignore them apparently
The Atari meltdown of teh 80s is a perfect counter example of this. The Nintendo Seal of Approval was specifically designed due to the utter tripe that was mareketed out from Atari. And for every Zelda or Metroid, there were 10 other terrible games like Superman 64, Pit Fighter, and Wayne's World.
AVGN and other reviewers make a living reviewing infamously terrible games from the past. The fact that no one has run out of terrible game to review shows that stuff wasn't 'better' in the old days.
Stop telling lies. I can name several games that have compelling stories that can keep people addicted for months...if not years. From my old memory: Fallout3, KOTOR, Far Cry, Deus Ex, Skyrim, Bioshock, Everything involving Half-Life, oh, Black Mesa Source, the Grand Theft Auto series (massive open worlds), and yes, even the Call of Duty franchise.
I lol anytime somebody yells "my IQ is 150 what is yours not 150? Then STFU."
Me: "Oh, you got me genius. Too bad there are 3 factors that measure IQ. Congratulations, you're so smart you didn't even know there's a 3 quiz requirement to being ranked literally smart."
Now to the OP. I agree that today's gaming generation disappoints me that they're excited about big franchises such as bf, WAW, GR, COD & Halo franchises. Only in that even though these games are good at what they do-they hinder true creativity & originally in the shooter genre of gaming. They're Mass popularity forces talented devs to go dumb and create crappy clones in hopes of catching the cash by impulsive gamers.
However, the problem isn't their intelligence. Its the fact that they don't see that they're doing exactly what these boss gaming corporations want. Ignore the fact that the Game companies aren't coming out with new material. They're making easy money. Matter of fact, this factor escaladed to the point that the game companies don't have to explain themselves for stealing ideas from other games or repeating storylines they've regurgitated from past failed games-(COD:BO2 for example or Ubisoft's own saga of Assassin's Creed) -fanboys are willing to kill if you even joke about their favorite games being duds when it counts. This is what disappoints me.
I, too would complain about 60 USD games, but now with the next-gen consoles (ex.PS4) You're new game costs above $60 jumping into the $75 USD range (not including tax).
That doesn't matter to me, I buy them games a couple month/years down the road on sales or find a FTP game that offers almost all the same features as the expensive (now I got to have it) franchise game. Not even factoring my friends willing to (force) me to play the game and maybe renting it so they can play with me...