Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Este tema ha sido cerrado 
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
Sure, Postal 2 is meant to be more comical, while Hatred looks very dark and serious. And I'll admit, I probably wouldn't play it because of that. And yes, Postal 2 has more to it. But you can't sit there and tell me that when the devs made Postal 2 that they didn't intend for you to kill everyone.
Everyone is killable, you have tons of weapons, NPCs act like jerks to you (which eases any guilt), and the entire point of the game seems to be to do simple everyday tasks in the most insane, extreme way possible. In fact, one could say that the objectives of the game are only there so people can't say it's just a killing simulator.
Offcourse my parents actually bothered to teach me wright from wrong and why it's allowed in video game.
Well I would agree with you but just recently a small dev team thought it would be a good idea to publicly issue a death threat to gaben over their game. Since there now is a precident of stupid in development teams, no matter the size, I wouldn't put it past any games developers/publishers to do something stupid like that.
Also sensless violence is fine (I mean hell I own every Saints Row game released so far) my stance is that for a game to have sensless violence then it needs something more to it (like comedy for example) to balance it out and make it an all around fun experience.
So I fully understand why this game was pulled if not just for the fact that it was only offering a murder simulator type experience, not a well rounded senseless violence experience.
You're not replying to him because he's got you nailed down.
What if it were a game you were looking forward to seeing on Steam? Would you still support it being yanked off the site? For that matter, what if a TV show or movie you were really looking forward to ended up not being broadcast or played at a theater near you? Would you be angry, or would you just be another drone that's happy to let someone else determine what's good for you?
Just because one human did something stupid doesn't mean the entire planet is also stupid. Don't project the faults of a weak willed individual on other game devs.
Wouldn't mentally unstable individuals be set of by right about any violent game? If we worry now about these people then we should ban every FPS,horror,hack and slash, most RPG, Every single Moba out there (come on Valve. I dare you to remove Dota2 rom sale as it's to violent and acidic.) and 90% of games ouyt there. Think only racing, sex and puzzle games should exist then.
Then we will be more or less safe.
I can speak from this view because I technically am mentally unstable and have undergone treatment. Not everyone is so lucky-- some can't afford it, some are outright ignored, and some never even find out they're unstable. Children are impressionable, too, even if you want to deny it.
I'm for Postal, I'm for GTA, Manhunt, Carmaggeddon, Saint's Row, and whatever other games you can throw in defence of your ♥♥♥♥♥♥ game. I'm anti-SJW. I understand the need of stress-relief through games. Still against Hatred.
I advise you to look deeper into those studies. There's biase and it's quite clear. Regardless, do we really need this game to undo the work that so many people have done to rid the stereotype that gamers are all psychotic freaks? That's what this would do-- no goal but to kill innocents.
I apologise for having moral standards instead of being an anarchistic ball of 'Hatred'.
Man talk about coming into a "conversation" late...
If you go back and follow it, I stopped talking to him because there is no longer any reason to talk to him. Unless you can explain to me why I should waste time repeating my self repeatedly because he refuses to acknowledge my side of this "argument" then I will still no longer reply to him as it is a waste of time and data.
Has nothing to do with him having me "nailed down"
I definitely say it looks like crap. The only reason why it is interesting so many people is because it is a controversial game. Not because it looks unique or good. It is a crappy looking murder simulator trying to get sales by being controversial.
If you cannot provide proof then your argument is naturally excluded and thrown into the trash. As all opinions that are being paraded as fact will and should be.
Look at the early Mortal Kombat games - fun games sure, but if you strip out all the gore what you're left with (at least for the earlier games) are fairly basic fighting games without a lot of depth (all characters have same uppercut move/similar jump ins, there are no combos etc.) - that game sold on the FMV/gore aspect, which is why the technically inferior Genesis version of MK greatly outsold the SNES title, because Nintendo censored the gore. Which is also why they left it in for MK2. There's a portion of the mass public that just loves mindless violence, the more graphic the better, and I think gameplay is secondary for many of these people.