Your oppinion on Sweet Baby Inc so the others can block

[Space is the Place]

This is getting too ridicoulous. So I propose the next, everyone choose between this two choices:

1 - I hate Sweet Baby Inc, they are a cancer to this industry and I´m not supporting extremist leftish ideologies that call out for white genocide

2 - I´m sick of seeing Sweet Baby Inc wacko alt-right threads all over the place, I´m here to play games not to discuss politics with every random child online


Then simply block everyone on the "opposite side". Let´s have two steam experiences, one were yall can stay mad about SBI and discuss all the games you ain´t buying, and another were the rest of us continue playing games we are interested in.

[Seraphita]

Messaggio originale di Jet Fuel Does Not Melt COVID:

Rev says desu - "Mainstream Media Calls For "Final Purge" Of Gamers Opposing Sweet Baby Inc"

I love this person in that video. This is what SBI does. Imagine being against people who are against SBI after hearing things like that. Oh sure. "It's drama". Like... Excuse us but SBI is saying in plain daylight that they want to purge gamers for being against them.

[Amaterasu]

Honestly, I'd trust Rev says desu as far as I can throw a truck. And to be perfectly frank, if I was given the choice of being shot in the belly or watching one of his videos... I'd only ask if I can call an ambulance first and to be shot twice.

Also he should stop saying desu. かわいい じゃないです

ロリコン は とても むかつくような です

[Seraphita]

Messaggio originale di sungoddess14:

Honestly, I'd trust Rev says desu as far as I can throw a truck. And to be perfectly frank, if I was given the choice of being shot in the belly or watching one of his videos... I'd only ask if I can call an ambulance first and to be shot twice.

He's right on most things so not sure what you're discontent about. Or is it the fact that he does not side with your opinions on many topics? Like, you can try to invalidate him as much as you like but it does not change that the facts he reports are true. So yeah...

[Amaterasu]

The internet is the land of confirmation bias where all someone has to do to be "right" is to be a youtuber or social media presence with a moderate following and support the viewpoints of others. I've said it before. I'll say it again. And I damn sure know I'm going to say it in the future. People don't want to think. People want to be told what to think. People want their viewpoints validated, no matter how horrific their viewpoints. And before the reply about, "That's your opinion", I'm referring to viewpoints like it's morally correct to engage in ethnic cleansing and cannibalism. Yes, I'm running towards the extreme here, because it does make a logical argument to do so here.

I've learned that people will agree with people that make them feel validated. People will flock to them and become loyal and they will try to think like them.

I don't trust Rev, I don't like Rev. Nothing anyone says is going to change my mind about this. I've made up my mind. I've come to my conclusion. There's not a number someone can write on a check that would change my mind. I would literally rather get shot, than to listen to him. There is no changing my mind on this.

類は友を呼ぶ

And one for the people who think the anti-woke isn't a side: 相手のない喧嘩はできぬ

[Seraphita]

Messaggio originale di sungoddess14:

I don't trust Rev, I don't like Rev. Nothing anyone says is going to change my mind about this. I've made up my mind. I've come to my conclusion. There's not a number someone can write on a check that would change my mind. I would literally rather get shot, than to listen to him. There is no changing my mind on this.

Except we know what it is really about, in your case. Like, you've proven yourself an anti... It's therefore logical that you would not like him. Of course there is no changing your mind but we still know why you don't like him. Problem is, you assume a lot in your post...

We can think and still like what someone says online. You use extreme examples because you think it is relevant when it's not in this situation. If you want to have a point in this argument, why not use an actual example that contradicts what is said in this thread?

So what is your opinion on the FACTS that SBI people tweeted that gamers should be purged for being against them? Now if you can answer that, we'll be back on track. Are you okay with SBI and its defenders saying this? Are you okay with SBI's racist remarks?

If you're not, why not let people "fight" SBI if they want to? It's not like you have to look at people doing it. The group is being pretty "quiet" on its side, just telling what games that SBI were involved into. I don't really see the harm there. Otherwise, enlighten me.

[Amaterasu]

I know the game, I know all the deflections, I've know the whole book. I'm not going to keep arguing and I'm not going to cross the line to get banned.

[Seraphita]

Messaggio originale di sungoddess14:

I know the game, I know all the deflections, I've know the whole book. I'm not going to keep arguing and I'm not going to cross the line to get banned. :SpadeSmug:

Okay, who asked that? All I asked from you was if you were okay or not with what SBI is doing. You thinking that there is a game of deflections is nothing but baseless conjectures. You already decided to form your own conclusions based on not sure what. o.O

It's baffling that you can't give an answer to "So what is your opinion on the FACT that SBI people tweeted that gamers should be purged for being against them?" I am sure that most people would give a clear "It's not okay." Answering this is not against the rules.

[SLG]

Messaggio originale di Seraphita:

Messaggio originale di sungoddess14:

I know the game, I know all the deflections, I've know the whole book. I'm not going to keep arguing and I'm not going to cross the line to get banned. :SpadeSmug:

Okay, who asked that? All I asked from you was if you were okay or not with what SBI is doing. You thinking that there is a game of deflections is nothing but baseless conjectures. You already decided to form your own conclusions based on not sure what. o.O

It's baffling that you can't give an answer to "So what is your opinion on the FACT that SBI people tweeted that gamers should be purged for being against them?" I am sure that most people would give a clear "It's not okay." Answering this is not against the rules.

Well, they have Freedom of Speech. So I am assuming that people who post these topics are saying it is wrong. Well, it could be wrong if people exactly do what they want. I could say all teens should go into the armed forces. That does not mean every teen will do that,

[Seraphita]

Messaggio originale di Lee:

Well, they have Freedom of Speech. So I am assuming that people who post these topics are saying it is wrong. Well, it could be wrong if people exactly do what they want. I could say all teens should go into the armed forces. That does not mean every teen will do that,

True. It's not like it WILL happen. But compared to teens going in the forces, telling people that every gamers against SBI should be "purged" is pretty wild. Freedom of speech or not, this is a big political war that shouldn't be. They say so many nasty things, too. o.o

[SLG]

Well, I do not see since I do not go looking for it.

[Seraphita]

Messaggio originale di Lee:

Well, I do not see since I do not go looking for it.

Fair. At the same time, it's not like we see the SBI group being advertised everywhere so I think it's okay if people want to be against them and follow the group to avoid games. People who do not want to see it can simply ignore that it exists and keep gaming. :D

[Amaterasu]

Messaggio originale di Lee:

Messaggio originale di Seraphita:

Okay, who asked that? All I asked from you was if you were okay or not with what SBI is doing. You thinking that there is a game of deflections is nothing but baseless conjectures. You already decided to form your own conclusions based on not sure what. o.O

It's baffling that you can't give an answer to "So what is your opinion on the FACT that SBI people tweeted that gamers should be purged for being against them?" I am sure that most people would give a clear "It's not okay." Answering this is not against the rules.

Well, they have Freedom of Speech. So I am assuming that people who post these topics are saying it is wrong. Well, it could be wrong if people exactly do what they want. I could say all teens should go into the armed forces. That does not mean every teen will do that,

In the interest of transparency, I didn't bother to read a single thing. I just kind of assumed, because I spoke out against Lolicon, that it was going to be another rant in favor of it. As for what I think of SBI saying that gamers should be purged for being against them? They're whackjobs with a platform. 20 years ago, no one would've cared, they're toothless and powerless, and at this point, mostly flailing away thinking that they have an army when their entire "army" could be considered 3 chickens and a ball of pocket lint.

And no, not chickens as in cowardly people. Chickens as in poultry.

[Seraphita]

Messaggio originale di sungoddess14:

Messaggio originale di Lee:

Well, they have Freedom of Speech. So I am assuming that people who post these topics are saying it is wrong. Well, it could be wrong if people exactly do what they want. I could say all teens should go into the armed forces. That does not mean every teen will do that,

In the interest of transparency, I didn't bother to read a single thing. I just kind of assumed,

And this is the entire issue. You don't read posts, you only assume. You're so hasty to escape to a safe space that you just ignore any arguments made and try to invalidate them as "deflections" anyway, without knowing what the word deflections even means.

It took a while for you to answer my question and we finally got something. So I believe it's safe to say that you should not have anything against people just having a group to point out what games SBI were involved with. Amusingly, you agree with what Revs said.

[👾]

Messaggio originale di Seraphita:

Messaggio originale di sungoddess14:

In the interest of transparency, I didn't bother to read a single thing. I just kind of assumed,

And this is the entire issue. You don't read posts, you only assume. You're so hasty to escape to a safe space that you just ignore any arguments made and try to invalidate them as "deflections" anyway, without knowing what deflections even means.

Exactly. They did that with me as well. It's quite funny that they openly admit it, yet still try to continue the "conversation" in spite of that. Most wokies are like this, except they don't say it out loud.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Messaggio originale di sungoddess14:

Messaggio originale di Lee:

Well, they have Freedom of Speech. So I am assuming that people who post these topics are saying it is wrong. Well, it could be wrong if people exactly do what they want. I could say all teens should go into the armed forces. That does not mean every teen will do that,

In the interest of transparency, I didn't bother to read a single thing. I just kind of assumed, because I spoke out against Lolicon, that it was going to be another rant in favor of it. As for what I think of SBI saying that gamers should be purged for being against them? They're whackjobs with a platform. 20 years ago, no one would've cared, they're toothless and powerless, and at this point, mostly flailing away thinking that they have an army when their entire "army" could be considered 3 chickens and a ball of pocket lint.

And no, not chickens as in cowardly people. Chickens as in poultry.

So why should people read anything you say if you refuse to read what they say?