Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
"Supposed to work" being the key phrase here.
Like I said above, it would be great if devs moderated their own hubs and the community moderated itself. Because Steam is a huge place, literally millions of users, it's seemingly impossible to moderate.
Hence, the practice of responding according to volume of reports. i suppose the logic is: if multiple people have complained about this, it's a no-brainer, people are offended, let's go ahead and get rid of it. Saves a lot of time. I understand that.
I just want Steam to be aware that most users know this unspoken practice and some have learned how to exploit it. It's the natural order i suppose, if something can be exploited, it will be.
And so report-bombing has become a thing, just as the review-bombing we all have come to know so well is a thing. Steam has taken measures to mitigate the impact of review bombing and so i hope that one day they may also become aware and take measures to mitigate the impact of report bombing.
What would it take? An assurance that every single report is reviewed for content prior to any action being taken. But imagine the man-hours that would require. it seems inconceivable.
Of course not.
Is this the case, Tonguc? Are you able to directly ban content from your game's hubs, or you may simply report it to Steam like any user?
Is that actually in the game or did they use an uncensored patch?
So there is the answer, directly refuting the suppositions made here, that devs cannot ban screenshots.
Did some research and it appears that the user did patch the game. It matters because you wouldn't be able to report it if that wasn't the case.
The screenshots are obviously against Steam guidelines but will they take it down is the question since the community won't do ♥♥♥♥ when it comes to R-18 material.
Screenshots with exact same theme, left untouched in the game hub:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1188834820
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1167183771
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1167183318
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1219957874
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1170246407
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1196328123
^ Just a few examples of similar shots not banned. There are more in the game gallery.
Regardless of whether this screenshot received a high volume of reports, the fact remains that it got banned despite the contents not violating specific steam guidelines, while similar shots from other users are safely left alone. Doesn't this illustrate that the support staff who responded to the reports were not vigilant about what contents they were actually banning, nor any sound judgment about whether the reports are justified? All in all, it appears that any innocuous uploads from anyone can get unjustly banned, as long as someone took the time to submit enough reports.
This is not the first time that bewildering bans have happened. Multiple steam users have experienced having their inoffensive uploads be banned, and to later hear from Steam Support that it was due to "volume of reports". Having one piece of uploaded content banned may not be serious in itself, but along with that, the rights to uploading are also suspended for a week, or longer, if there was more than one content banned. This is stressful and detrimental for a user who in fact did nothing wrong, especially when the sabotage takes place continuously - over months, for a friend of mine.
The reporting policy on steam was put in place to protect users from harmful contents and behaviors. Yet, now there is a trend of malicious users who have reversed this, abusing the system to sabotage innocent users, very simply through creating multiple free accounts for submitting high amount of reports. And in this specific case of Sabina's, Matt states that it did not receive a high volume, but it remains true that Sabina's shot was somehow deemed worthy of a ban while other similar shots are not - which continues to point towards the fact that the staff were not careful in their banning decision.
With such wrongful use of the reporting system, how then can the average user feel safe about using the community? The only way to counteract this kind of abuse, is when steam support staff become discriminating and more vigilant - upon receiving reports, take the time needed to judge whether that upload indeed deserves a ban, and not make automatic bans based simply on volume of reports.
You won't get a permaban since the your items are falsely reported. Valve just needs to get thier sh!t together (which I doubt they will) to stop the abuse.