Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
You are updating a review, not reviewing for the first time.
if you review a game in march and give it a negitive review then after a patch decide it was acturly good and change the origanal review then it should show the new date not to old one
hiya if you look at the date it now shows the original date it was reviewd and then shows the new date underneath i thisk this is a new thing as ive deleated ones before and then rewriten a review and its been only the new date
think to what happend togta5 during the mod fiasco people changerd there reviews and it got its mostly positive state down to mostly negitive,it doesnt need to be a new review to make a difference to that states.
When I am deleting review and writing new one, I expect it to have a new date as published, but not updated. And the problem which this causes is that my review can`t be shown for most of the people and it won`t get phumbs up/down for it as it is not in recent reviews and it is hard to find it, almost impossible, if the first time date when I published it was about a year ago.
I just don`t like this "feature".
True
If they didn't do it this way, people with an agenda would frequently, and in some cases: automatically, re-post their reviews as "new" so that they get the most exposure.
Reviews aren't screened, so there is no human person who can compare your old review to the new one and say, "Oh, this is completely different, it should be flagged as new." An automated system can check if a review is identical, or even mostly identical, but it cannot check if the "message" of the review is different. If you have a reason to bash or hype a game, you could just reword the essentially same review in ways that no automated system would catch. That is why the review system works the way it does.
The lesson here is not to post premature reviews.
Okay, thanks for information, clearly got an answer why it is working in that way, have a nice day!