Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
What do graphics have to do with enjoyment?
and of course main reason are skins. If there would be still blank guns playerbase would be 90% smaller. It became a who has a cooler pixel gun showoff channel.
2) unattractive characters - where it's better to skip the dialogue
3) bad mechanics - CTRL +C, CTRL +V from any other game
4) story - based on current world problems that no longer make sense after a long development
Good Old Games.
Is age a prerequisite for a game to be fun, engaging, or at the very least a way to take one's mind off other problems. Great problem solvers have found that, when stumped, by removing one's focus from a problem, the solution they've striven for often simply bubbles up like it was always there. Games are problem solving.
Why does it matter if it was made in 2025 or 500 AD? Chess for example. Sure, we now have AI's that can literally think 37 moves ahead and play as such, but it's still a logic problem that advances us as a whole. Are you whining about chess? No, you're not good at chess at all.
Ok, how about checkers? You know how to play that game, right? It's even older. A lot older. 3000 BC by most accounts -- people were better at playing checkers than recording history back then.
The grandfather of computerized RPG, Zork, came out in 1977. There are innumerable references to "You are standing in an open field west of a white house..." that you, as a gamer groupie, will never understand if you only focus on what was released in the past 3 minutes. Also, bleeding edge software is by definition full of bugs and imbalances that make the exercise garbage since they'll release a patch or version soon to correct what you just experienced.
To ramble on, why is it that so many 'new' games use retro, pixelated graphics? I'm sure they didn't get the Unity memo. Meshes, textures, 3D, how confusing. Certainly these game devs would have eschewed engines pre-equipped with all this eye candy in favor of some 'old' looking graphics to present their player base.
And finally, after having typed all this, I realize you're just an attention seeking momma's boy. Fine. Score 1 for you this round. But you've got no legs to stand with for rounds 2-3000BC