安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
You were never guaranteed to always have access to your account or games. It's not like older Macs are the only ones affected. It's the same with Windows XP. It's time to move on to something less ancient. Even my ten year old PC can run a current OS.
EULAs are filled with legalize, that in many instances, is simply desigend to negate responsibility or liability on the company. There have been many cases where EULAs infringed on the rights of the individual and were thrown out in court. EULA validity is determined on a case to case basis and is not generally accepted or rejected. In fact, due to their pages long lengths, courts have rejected terms on the basis that the company assumed most people would not read them.
When it comes to this "NO GARUNTEE" clause. It has nothing to do with one's access to their games nor does it state that Valve may terminate service or access. Simply that Valve or the Game Developers can not garuntee Steam, its games, your account or services may be secure, error-free or virus-free continuously. It is protecting itself from hijacking and/or human error.
Language has meaning and if you hope to understand that meaning, you must place it in its proper context. This is similar to FCC Warnings on electronics.
Sure, you may find a few of those in OT, but that's the exception, not the rule.
Locking a topic doesn't mean start another one.
Windows XP released 2001
Windows Vista released 2007
MacOS 10.9 Mavericks released 2013
MacOS 10.10 Yosemite released 2014
Steam will continue to support Windows 7, which was released in 2009. They are basing their support decisions on the number of users, not the age, of the operating systems.
As others have noted, EULAs are not enforceable over consumer laws. But consumer laws do not provide for extensive remedies. Some *may* be able to get a refund for purchases that were made within the last couple of months (and made before the warning appeared), at best.
Personally, I am not saying that Valve doesn't have the right to drop support for Mavericks and Yosemite, I am saying that they shouldn't do it because it is completely unnecessary.
The games we've bought run fine on these systems. Most of the Steam client (including the oh-so-important DRM) runs fine on these systems. They are dropping support because they want to use a new version of their embedded browser that doesn't run on these systems, despite the fact that many of us do not even use the browser.
There's nothing wrong with starting a new topic if the old one was locked because of a troll. It wasn't locked because the topic was inappropriate.
100 topics will not prevent it.
I don't think we're concerned about full support. I don't care if the update means I can't download any new games. I care if the update means I can no longer play any games already installed on my computer (I have Yosemite). I think that would be ridiculous.
If anything, I'll switch over to my windows 7 partition if I have to but that drains my battery extremely fast.
"Remember to keep all comments constructive, relevant and respectful when posting on the Steam forums."
Lets not start that again. Please :)