Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
That's what i though but i wasnt sure. if i had the money i would get a decent PC gaming rig and not a PS4. PS4 is not backwards compatible either :(
And yea, cell ps3 tech demos....every generation of consoles has the same lie lol
Though PC gaming has been much cheaper due to shops like Steam, Desura, GOG and the rest.
What the PS4 may be great for is as a render node if you can make use of all of the hardware in Linux, the GPU is basically an HD7950m paired up with 8GB of GDDR5 shared with an 8 core CPU. Optimization will keep it graphically competitive for a little while.
What is good for Radeon GPU users is that since the PS4, XBO and WiiU all use Radeon GPUs PC game companies would be quite dumb to sign up to Nvidia's "The Way It's Meant To Be Played" Nvidia only optimization on the PC side and since in the case of the PS4 and XBO are X86-64 based and as suck ports between them and PC will be much easier for them and it shouldn't be as bad as the current state of console ports.
They are a lot weaker and with a lot less raw processing power than the parts you'll find in a middle to high range gaming PC but I think they'll get a lot more out of it than one would imagine simply by optimizing the hell out of the games. They'll all run on the same hardware after all. By the way, in my opinion the PS4s biggest asset are the 8 GB ram, not the processors. 8 GB is a lot for a console.
Also the PS4 doesn't have bad mods who ban you from PSN
"backlash" exists only amoungst the most vocal die hards in a internet echo chamber.
Sony and linux, well, remember the ps3, and no, theres no point in buying it as a renderer when already you can get more powerful gpu's and cpu's today, the promise of the ps3 as a "super computer" sorta didn't pan out, everyone just still went with the x86 giant render farm model.
Its a lot for now, but that happens with every console, in a few years it will look like nothing. What pc's were people using 7 years ago? The current consoles have 512mb ram, well that was basically what a budget pc had back then http://www.pcworld.com/article/127985/article.html Now you can buy 16+ for almost nothing, in a few years the gap will just increase. Biggest thing for pc's was the ssd, but console can't afford that kind of performance boost.
It's not just that it's 8Gb of ram, it's 8GB of GDDR5 video ram, but it's using AMD's new HSA architecture so that the CPU shares the GPU's ram pool.
AMD's Kaveri series APUs will be using it on the desktop. What it does it removes the limitations of the standard DDR3 ram for the APU as well as the latency limitations of the PCI bus.
So what does it mean? GPU based physics and AI calculations! They'll be far faster then even sending it from an i7 Haswell to an HD7970 since it doesn't have to be copied back and fourth between the system ram to the GPU ram processing and get sent back to the CPU to be added back to the game engine data then that data sent to the GPU to be drawn on the screen.