Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
9/10 for graphics on both of them.
They both have pretty good playability.
Sure, it doesn't look too great nowadays, but the graphics were just about par for its day. The NPC interactions and storytelling was what really elevated HL above its contemporaries. Its modability gave rise to Counter-Strike and dozens of other games. Not just mods - actual games that were sold at retail. Take a second and try to find a complete list of how many awards Half-Life has won. It's a long list. And it sold an average of one million units per year for at least five years after its release, not even counting digital sales or other platforms.
I like to think they're equal.
As for Half Life 2,it's good but i prefer TF2 and Portal over it.
Dota 2: Had played wc3 dota 1 for many years before i moved to dota 2, so i had prey good knowledge of the game. For multiplayer game this is the best i have played and by far the most played game i have ever played. (if including dota 1) The beginning is hard but when you learn the basics and success its AWSOME. Every game of this is different.
http://www.pcgamer.com/review/dota-2-review/
Multiplayer: Counter-Strike