安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
For great improvement of overall image qualities, small detail loss could be excused, to make it a watchable resolution. But, not something to completely remove the old film. Rather to just watch temporarily. If it cannot maintain 100% detail of the images, it shouldn't be used as a permanent solution.
AI will get there, some day.
Someone seems to have taken the way it works with games and thought that was a good idea without understanding why it works so flawlessly in specific circumstances with video games, which follow strict rules and limitations as to what textures are used and how they're rendered.
ie. Another example of someone understanding that the technology is useful, sort of understanding how it is useful, but then missing some important detail and using it in a way that doesn't actually fulfill the goal or offer any quality improvement.
If you don't understand how a tool works or affects the quality of your work, then you probably shouldn't be using it.
There are A.I. tech businesses and then A.I. "tech businesses".
One of these classifications is legit, and one of them is just a scam.
It's the scams that will go out of business and be filing bankruptcy and I'm struggling to see why it's such a bad thing if a scammer goes out of business.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTSDIP2jiqY
Now, if you have temporal lobe operating without any other parts of brain, their aren't going to be a lot of smart decisions going on and the behavior will be very similar to an LLM but it's still brain-matter that produces the behaviors of the temporal lobe.
LLMs are indeed not remastering movies but the reason it's being called AI isn't "to be cool".
If anything calling it a "remaster" when it's frankly not because it demonstrates no mastery at all and has plenty of things to criticize, is the part that's supposed "to be cool". (And it's not cool.)
I'd probably buy Baldur's Gate 3 after watching that movie.
truth is we cannot deny llm's are getting extremely powerful as ram and nodes increase.
there needs to be a point where it really stops.
to give you a idea, a llm is trained apon tons of human data.. so a ai that learns to copy itself learned that where? and there have been cases already.
humans value life and machines see that value too because their based on us.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEUO6pjwFOo
Highlight :
Even different humans have different values so people like killers and narcissists are good examples for this concept too. Like, exactly how good do you have to be at admiring your own reflection or killing people before you stop caring about that and start caring about something else entirely like feeding the hungry? It's just not going to happen.
Same, if I wouldn't already have it.