Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
feminists laughed it off for a long time, as the 'patriarchial dominance' line was so thoroughly ingrained in the rhetoric. it was simply not possible for men to experience negative feeling outcomes, and if they did that was a good. I'm sure you won't find any toxic masculines arguing otherwise.
the issue became more of a focal point in third wave feminism, as many women felt alienated by second wave's adoption of toxic masculine behaviorisms, such as their response to the idea of toxic masculinity.
still, historically it was developed by men who had become invovled in near-feminist circles before those circles threw out all the 'non-women,' just like black activists threw out all the non-blacks, and poors and rich people dedicated to economic reform also tend to self-segregate.
toxic masculinity teaches people to codify emotions and feelings as threats. women tend to practice renegotiating the issue, claiming their emotions as strengths or whatnot, and have a variety of social pathways towards encouraging these responses.
men are expected to simply cut their emotions off, like dolls. otherwise they will be attacked, for one reason or another, until they stop displaying any form of emotion.
Most of the ancient heroes cried their eyes out as some point, Achilles probably being the best known for it.
In general, it's trying to be a man while being insecure about your manliness and trying to prove you are to others (and yourself). This can lead to things like sexism/homophobia/transphobia due to a lack respect for things that aren't masculine or engaging with violence because you need to show the world how tough you think you are.
Obviously, this is neither a one size fits all explanation, nor is it an exhaustive one. It's just what came to mind.
There's more to it than that but I'm not spending hours writing out every edge case I can think to account for.
If ya get it, ya get it, y'know?
When my wife sends me to the store for that item they don't even want to buy I'm cool with it. I'll go to the men's section grab a shirt off the rack go to the female hygiene section use the shirt to grab them and wrap it up in the shirt go to self checkout scan them while holding them with the shirt drop them in the bag then sit the shirt on the candy rack. Then put them in 5 or 6 plastic bags so no one sees what's in the bag.
1- It's not true, emotions are a strengh, if you know how to deal with those and use those to your advantage. Anger is especially usefull as a motivator and to ensure your combat readyness, fear is usefull to avoid danger, sadness is usefull to think about what you did wrong and improve, etc. Thinking those are a weakness don't make you more of a man, it just make you an idiot imo.
2- Men and women are partners in life, both have their strenghs and weaknesses and have to learn how make the best possible team out of it. The very concept of superior and inferior beings based on sex is also stupid imo.
3- Well, "mind your own business" I guess.
From my point of view you just describe one kind of idiots and arguing with idiots is an entertaining thing to do, but also a huge waste of time.