Andrew Tate

[Poutine]

Thoughts?

I personally think he takes advantage of insecure, deprived young men / incels who believe Sigma and Alpha are a thing. Kind of like how he admitted to emotionally manipulating women for gain in text messages and pimping them out. I'll disregard the other allegations, but there is tangible proof about him manipulating women in his own words.

No, I won't spoon feed you and provide you with a link because it's all over the internet and documented in court. Go sea lion elsewhere.

That's my personal opinion, how about you?

Keep it civil plox

[repaeR]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Dwagon swayer pwincess savuh:

Ursprungligen skrivet av repaeR:

So, if I go with your logic, does that mean that it is not transphobic to not accept any trans people or anyone that doesn't accept their own identity?...because apparently, there are main stream medias, corporate, woke people constantly wanting to pander the alphabet communities, because the alphabet communities are insecure of their own image, identity, so they are being taken advantage of?

Tate doesn't take advantage of "insecure, deprived young men/ incels". He gave out free advises to make men to be better men. He doesn't get anything else in return beside his fame for being a big influencer. Speaking of influencers, there are tons, tons, tons of braindead tiktok influencers out there, they provide nothing but destructive behavior, non productive unfathered, unemployed behavior. Are you targeting only Tate, or everyone else too? Why do you target the good, but not the bad?

Men today are weak, feeble, and low testosterone. Not just that, they have very low on moral standard too.

Good men create good time.
Weak men create hard time.

Yea, you are definitely brainwashed by evil mainstream medias. Tate surely isn't a saint, or totally innocent, but he is far much better than what your opinion is about him.

Shut up. You wrote a lot of nothing go away you emotional mess defending another grown ass man accused of some serious crimes.

Yea, a lot of “nothing” for someone that couldn’t use his brain. Sure. I agree.

Even you liked to use word “accused”. Sure. I agree. “Accused” without any valid proof.

I defended a grown ass man? Yea sure, at least a good one. Unlike you, you probably care to defend some braindead influencer tiktokers that actually are doing more harm to society than good.

Yea people like you, that’s why society has continued to go to crap.

[videomike_Ultimate_Plushie]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Dwagon swayer pwincess savuh:

Ursprungligen skrivet av repaeR:

So, if I go with your logic, does that mean that it is not transphobic to not accept any trans people or anyone that doesn't accept their own identity?...because apparently, there are main stream medias, corporate, woke people constantly wanting to pander the alphabet communities, because the alphabet communities are insecure of their own image, identity, so they are being taken advantage of?

Tate doesn't take advantage of "insecure, deprived young men/ incels". He gave out free advises to make men to be better men. He doesn't get anything else in return beside his fame for being a big influencer. Speaking of influencers, there are tons, tons, tons of braindead tiktok influencers out there, they provide nothing but destructive behavior, non productive unfathered, unemployed behavior. Are you targeting only Tate, or everyone else too? Why do you target the good, but not the bad?

Men today are weak, feeble, and low testosterone. Not just that, they have very low on moral standard too.

Good men create good time.
Weak men create hard time.

Yea, you are definitely brainwashed by evil mainstream medias. Tate surely isn't a saint, or totally innocent, but he is far much better than what your opinion is about him.

Shut up. You wrote a lot of nothing go away you emotional mess defending another grown ass man accused of some serious crimes.

good sir I accuse you of murder and robbery of my sister's body. Do I have a sister? Who cares that be defending you, a murderer. Do you see how stupid that is? Who cares he's been accused of, defending a man's moral personage be it informed or otherwise doesn't suddenly become off the table because he gets accused of something.

[Boblin the Goblin]

Ursprungligen skrivet av videomike_Ultimate_Plushie:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Dwagon swayer pwincess savuh:

Shut up. You wrote a lot of nothing go away you emotional mess defending another grown ass man accused of some serious crimes.

good sir I accuse you of murder and robbery of my sister's body. Do I have a sister? Who cares that be defending you, a murderer. Do you see how stupid that is? Who cares he's been accused of, defending a man's moral personage be it informed or otherwise doesn't suddenly become off the table because he gets accused of something.

It does when his own text and website(that he attempted to delete) are evidence of those accusations.

[Morkonan]

Ursprungligen skrivet av repaeR:

...
Men today are weak, feeble, and low testosterone. Not just that, they have very low on moral standard too.
..

I'm a "man today."

I'm not weak, feeble, nor do I have low testosterone. (Unnaturally high testosterone increases one's cancer risks, by the way. But, only ignorant people don't know that. Make sure you keep taking those testosterone-inducing supplements!! Tasty, right! Man-making, huh?)

I didn't and don't need losers like Tate thinking they can tell me or anyone else how to "be a man." Men like him end up in prison and with nothing. Tate's on his way! I'm sure you're very proud of his accomplishments.

If you follow him and believe in what he says, you'll end up like him or end up servicing him. Won't that be wonderful for you? Yup, surely it will. (You will simply fail at being what you so desperately want to be and will never comprehend why. That's sad. And, it's inevitable as long as one is a slave to Tate.)

It's a pity that kids are lured into cults like Tate's. They need better parenting, not more Tate videos that do nothing but keep them engaged with him and his worthless gibberish. They are already serving him and don't even realize how pathetic his concept of "manliness" actually is.

[repaeR]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Morkonan:

Ursprungligen skrivet av repaeR:

...
Men today are weak, feeble, and low testosterone. Not just that, they have very low on moral standard too.
..

I'm a "man today."

I'm not weak, feeble, nor do I have low testosterone. (Unnaturally high testosterone increases one's cancer risks, by the way. But, only ignorant people don't know that. Make sure you keep taking those testosterone-inducing supplements!! Tasty, right! Man-making, huh?)

I didn't and don't need losers like Tate thinking they can tell me or anyone else how to "be a man." Men like him end up in prison and with nothing. Tate's on his way! I'm sure you're very proud of his accomplishments.

If you follow him and believe in what he says, you'll end up like him or end up servicing him. Won't that be wonderful for you? Yup, surely it will. (You will simply fail at being what you so desperately want to be and will never comprehend why. That's sad. And, it's inevitable as long as one is a slave to Tate.)

It's a pity that kids are lured into cults like Tate's. They need better parenting, not more Tate videos that do nothing but keep them engaged with him and his worthless gibberish. They are already serving him and don't even realize how pathetic his concept of "manliness" actually is.

Having "low testosterone" is kinda like a metaphor. It didn't really mean outright that one should have "high testosterone" either, not literally. You should have about just right like what men should have.

Men fought and died in the past, in front line, so that I, you and many can enjoy this, progressed or advanced civilization.

You don't just pump tons of testosterone either, so that you can become a man automatically. Only ignorant people wouldn't catch the metaphor.

You shouldn't call him a "loser"? Why? Jealousy? He probably makes more money than you, he probably can beat you up in the fight, hand to hand combat too (he was and is trained to be a fighter); but that's being said, I don't idolize him.

You see, this is funny. I defended him, for at least only what I heard of what he said. So, listening and agreeing what he teaches for men today automatically makes me as part of his "cult"??? He spoke UNIVERSAL TRUTH about how and what men should be. Being disciplined and strong are wrong???? Even if my enemy preaches about how one should train and fight on daily basis, I still wouldn't disagree with him just because of my spite.

Of course, I don't agree 100% with everything he said, because every man has style, and I don't agree with everything that he does either, because perhaps, I and he have a different view on morality.

Oh, and I don't even listen and follow him 100%, because unlike many, I don't idolize people, that encourages me to think for myself, but it still didn't change the fact that I agree with what he said. Whatever I knew, or heard of him, it probably accounts for like 20%-30% of his life. I don't know what he does behind the door, but I know that there are lots of BS coming from BS mainstream medias that try to take him down.

Evil governments and mainstream medias want to make men weaker everyday, and they continue to do so. FACT.

Oh last, but not least, Tate is a Muslim, and that religion already conflicted with my belief, but it still doesn't change the fact that I would agree with what he teaches how men should be.

Yea, if you disagree almost 100% about the view on how men should be, you are already weak. You can deny, but it severely implicates how weak your will is, as a man.

As always

Good men create good time.
Weak men create bad time.

[Scott, President of Dominos]

I like him,

Because his fans are so insecure that you can really get under their skin without much effort.

It’s like he’s a lightning rod for the most fragile males imaginable, even bigger than Jordan Peterson.

[Plaid]

Ursprungligen skrivet av repaeR:

Ursprungligen skrivet av Morkonan:

I'm a "man today."

I'm not weak, feeble, nor do I have low testosterone. (Unnaturally high testosterone increases one's cancer risks, by the way. But, only ignorant people don't know that. Make sure you keep taking those testosterone-inducing supplements!! Tasty, right! Man-making, huh?)

I didn't and don't need losers like Tate thinking they can tell me or anyone else how to "be a man." Men like him end up in prison and with nothing. Tate's on his way! I'm sure you're very proud of his accomplishments.

If you follow him and believe in what he says, you'll end up like him or end up servicing him. Won't that be wonderful for you? Yup, surely it will. (You will simply fail at being what you so desperately want to be and will never comprehend why. That's sad. And, it's inevitable as long as one is a slave to Tate.)

It's a pity that kids are lured into cults like Tate's. They need better parenting, not more Tate videos that do nothing but keep them engaged with him and his worthless gibberish. They are already serving him and don't even realize how pathetic his concept of "manliness" actually is.

Having "low testosterone" is kinda like a metaphor. It didn't really mean outright that one should have "high testosterone" either, not literally. You should have about just right like what men should have.

Men fought and died in the past, in front line, so that I, you and many can enjoy this, progressed or advanced civilization.

You don't just pump tons of testosterone either, so that you can become a man automatically. Only ignorant people wouldn't catch the metaphor.

You shouldn't call him a "loser"? Why? Jealousy? He probably makes more money than you, he probably can beat you up in the fight, hand to hand combat too (he was and is trained to be a fighter); but that's being said, I don't idolize him.

You see, this is funny. I defended him, for at least only what I heard of what he said. So, listening and agreeing what he teaches for men today automatically makes me as part of his "cult"??? He spoke UNIVERSAL TRUTH about how and what men should be. Being disciplined and strong are wrong???? Even if my enemy preaches about how one should train and fight on daily basis, I still wouldn't disagree with him just because of my spite.

Of course, I don't agree 100% with everything he said, because every man has style, and I don't agree with everything that he does either, because perhaps, I and he have a different view on morality.

Oh, and I don't even listen and follow him 100%, because unlike many, I don't idolize people, that encourages me to think for myself, but it still didn't change the fact that I agree with what he said. Whatever I knew, or heard of him, it probably accounts for like 20%-30% of his life. I don't know what he does behind the door, but I know that there are lots of BS coming from BS mainstream medias that try to take him down.

Evil governments and mainstream medias want to make men weaker everyday, and they continue to do so. FACT.

Oh last, but not least, Tate is a Muslim, and that religion already conflicted with my belief, but it still doesn't change the fact that I would agree with what he teaches how men should be.

Yea, if you disagree almost 100% about the view on how men should be, you are already weak. You can deny, but it severely implicates how weak your will is, as a man.

As always

Good men create good time.
Weak men create bad time.

The quote is “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.”

I'm not implying whether I agree with that or not.

[Dracoco OwO]

I do not hold thoughts for a person such as him, he's not worth talking about or care for and everything he stand for is vile and rotten.

[Dr Madbastard]

Andrew Tate's theme music is goated though!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOTeBVtlnXU

[repaeR]

Ursprungligen skrivet av Plaid:

Ursprungligen skrivet av repaeR:

Having "low testosterone" is kinda like a metaphor. It didn't really mean outright that one should have "high testosterone" either, not literally. You should have about just right like what men should have.

Men fought and died in the past, in front line, so that I, you and many can enjoy this, progressed or advanced civilization.

You don't just pump tons of testosterone either, so that you can become a man automatically. Only ignorant people wouldn't catch the metaphor.

You shouldn't call him a "loser"? Why? Jealousy? He probably makes more money than you, he probably can beat you up in the fight, hand to hand combat too (he was and is trained to be a fighter); but that's being said, I don't idolize him.

You see, this is funny. I defended him, for at least only what I heard of what he said. So, listening and agreeing what he teaches for men today automatically makes me as part of his "cult"??? He spoke UNIVERSAL TRUTH about how and what men should be. Being disciplined and strong are wrong???? Even if my enemy preaches about how one should train and fight on daily basis, I still wouldn't disagree with him just because of my spite.

Of course, I don't agree 100% with everything he said, because every man has style, and I don't agree with everything that he does either, because perhaps, I and he have a different view on morality.

Oh, and I don't even listen and follow him 100%, because unlike many, I don't idolize people, that encourages me to think for myself, but it still didn't change the fact that I agree with what he said. Whatever I knew, or heard of him, it probably accounts for like 20%-30% of his life. I don't know what he does behind the door, but I know that there are lots of BS coming from BS mainstream medias that try to take him down.

Evil governments and mainstream medias want to make men weaker everyday, and they continue to do so. FACT.

Oh last, but not least, Tate is a Muslim, and that religion already conflicted with my belief, but it still doesn't change the fact that I would agree with what he teaches how men should be.

Yea, if you disagree almost 100% about the view on how men should be, you are already weak. You can deny, but it severely implicates how weak your will is, as a man.

As always

Good men create good time.
Weak men create bad time.

The quote is “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.”

I'm not implying whether I agree with that or not.

Yea, same concept. Point is that without good men, things will ruin, sooner or later.