安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
What is the message you think he is trying to create ?
What I see is youngsters dropping all values, fooling around with the other gender while having a partner at home, women not valuing family anymore at all and everyone starting to only get kids in their late 30s, which medically involves some risks and is even financially and regarding life plannings not the smartest choice.
Andrew Tate has never said anything but " Value women as women, let the gender roles be an ok thing and value your family ". Its basically the message he delivers.
Except for some contorversies, there is generally nothing bad about this guy's message.
Problem is that people like you never actually listened to the guy or did so while being totally biased due to mass media and feminist ideology that was injected into your young head.
We are in a time in which young men are ashamed and scared to be men and want a woman that is also acting like a woman, not like a table dancer.
But I gave up on trying to " explain" things to dudes younger than me or who have their own believe and way of life. Eventually, do whatever you want. But Andrew Tate gets a lot of attention from young man for a reason, one of the reasons being is that what he preaches is natural and normal and not built on some new modern socially engineered concept that now apparently everyone has to follow as otherwise one is called a mysogonist, racist or woman hater of some sort.
Have a good weekend.
You still miss it? You are talking about Price Andrew. Andrew Tate is a different person.
Miss what, a country that sank below the waves 5000 years ago and still needs my immediate attention almost every moment of my waking and sleeping lives because it's grown to become the single most powerful country on the planet? No, there's nothing to miss, I haven't had a moment away in all that time. I had to be in multiple places at once, trying to keep England away from Japan while keeping Japan from turning into England, while also being eferywhere else doing everything else. All of which leads right back to the UK. It's maddening.
Prince Andrew simply engaged an Epstein network, and yeah I confuse him with Charles III. They're so similar they may as well both be skinsuits; I don't know. Tate is clearly targetting the same aesthetic, imo.
Which one is the CI again?
"Except for some controversies..."
Yeah, those. Gosh, just some little "controversies," huh?
You're supporting Andrew Tate and his message. That's all I need to know.
I have stated my opinion and I am not going to argue your's nor defend mine. I believe my statements are self-evident, supported by the foundations of reality itself and needing no interpretation.
That's because I'm not a fourteen year-old that has no life experience and is desperately looking to some random loudmouthed idgit for mature guidance.
I have, unfortunately, been unable to avoid having seen more about this broken man-child than I'd ever want to see and I now know enough about him and his "message" (which is the demand that emotionally dependent adolescent children keep following him) to make an informed judgement call.
I'll leave this here: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/andrew-tate-indicted-romania-trial-rape-human-trafficking-charges-rcna90121
I believe everyone is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. But, this behavior, if true, was inevitable. If not in this trial, then in the next... or the next. As long as he keeps believing his own adolescent message, this is where he is destined to be.
I think kids deserve a better role-model than that.
He used it as a platform to push his brand, ie no trolls in my hole without my permission, then ended with 'but we should trust the science, since it's all we have here.' Media positions are pretty popular with royals since it's basically busywork shouting into the void, and you get to be visible instead of the invisible hand that's shaped everyones lives since birth.
I've only ever heard about Tate from the endless posts here. And a little bit on a podcast, who considered him too worthless as a media figure to really roast. (Too easy.) He seems obsessed with his own visibility.
Am I correct about his stance on mRNA vaccination?
Problem being he is controversial, and just like any controversial figure his detractors with shrug away whatever he says as if it was some cursed malediction that should be bannished from reality, and his fans will swallow all everything he says as if it was blessing from God that shouldn't be questionned.
He trafficked women so that he could feel seen and important.
Are you trolling by pretending to support him for the same reasons, or do you empathize with him because you also feel unseen and unheard?
I do not support or hate him, so calm down angry boy
Ahem, I am not angry, and I am not exerting effort not to turn capslock on in responding. Nonsense.
I guess I just responded like that because so many people have hit me with the same complete lack of faith, and I just don't feel like carrying that forwards here. But there's nothing about your response that stops me from doing so, if I wanted to.
As such poor people like you and me aren't rewarded for civlity. Rather, we're taken advantage of by it.