安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
That's the Tabula Rasa of child-development theory.
It's not quite correct.
Yes, early childhood has a very great impact on future behavioral and cognitive development. But, there can also be issues with developmental or neonatal problems that influence behavior and development. There can be people who are born already behind the curve... it happens.
The best bet is to assume that the canvas is not always the same before a child's experiences get to paint on it.
I think it's Nietzsche, though. Had a similar discussion with a friend of mine who was claiming this and a lot more Nietzsche stuff. I agree with mostly nothing Nietzsche is about personally. My friend thinks I'm crazy ofc and that's why it's an unhealthy mindset as a whole.
A sociopath is made
if ndes are true that is
People become evil via abuse and/or toxicity from their parents, school, sociopolitical environment, etc.
Personality factors into this of course, but there is NO reputable research out there that has ever successfully narrowed down definitive "markers" - because there is always someone completely sane and nonviolent with the same traits.
you're neither when you're born, but you are capable of both.
baby is like a blank paper until someone paints on it aka teaches them things.
1. Men tend to be more aggressive than women, and this plays out in men becoming serial killers, rapist, and mass shootings are done by men.
2. Men develop their frontal cortex much later in life. This leads to risky behavior.
3. What about mental illness? Or being in a violent home? With an abusive father.
With that said, being "evil" is a learned behavior. But, we do have "evil" people like Dahmer, Bundy and Adolf Hitler who still did very bad things although their environment wasn't bad, or negative.
Evil is like a disease that lies dormant in the heart of every man. For some, it activates, and for others, it never does. Sometimes it even goes back to sleep, but it's always there.
The foundation of evil is your body, and you're born with it. Maybe it can spread to your soul too, if you believe in it ~ but I don't reckon it starts there.
On the theological side meanwhile, man has an infinite potential for both good and evil. What with the whole guardian angel and personal demon allegory in regards to free will and one's conscience. All people have to do is decide which one they should listen to.
This is already proven. Go do your research in Psychology/Psychiatry about it.
The experts will explain it in more detail.
We have to form the morals first, and define what evil is in the first place. It can never be genetic, while it´s of course possible that some people might differ genetically from the norm people wish it to be.
Just writing, because You say it´s already proven.
And i don´t think psychology in the western world works with being "evil".
Some human beings will never stop looking for quack eugenics that gives them an excuse to hate/kill everyone different from themselves.
Hmm
Reckon that qualifies as "evil?"