MGTOW is winning

[Chocobo & Moogle]

Men aren't approaching women anymore. Women picked the bear.

[Chocobo & Moogle]

gugnihr님이 먼저 게시:

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

Men aren't approaching women anymore. Women picked the bear.

You seem very concerned and resentful.
It is not winning if you do it with anger.
MGTOW is not a race and it is not about beating somebody else, MGTOW is only about giving to your own personal interests and personal happines the top priority and not being used by others.
You should leave this kind of incel - like mentality out of it. If you are not happy to go your own way then it means that it was not your own way at all after all.

No, I'm happy that it's happening. It means women can't be entitled to things anymore.

[Chocobo & Moogle]

I just came here to rub it in the face of people

[SvarogX]

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

gugnihr님이 먼저 게시:

You seem very concerned and resentful.
It is not winning if you do it with anger.
MGTOW is not a race and it is not about beating somebody else, MGTOW is only about giving to your own personal interests and personal happines the top priority and not being used by others.
You should leave this kind of incel - like mentality out of it. If you are not happy to go your own way then it means that it was not your own way at all after all.

No, I'm happy that it's happening. It means women can't be entitled to things anymore.

To be honest, you seem to be rather frustrated that you can't find a female partner to have a good and happy relationship with, hence you are evading to hate, to try to find some sort of higher purpose in your failure rather than facing the actual problem and trying to work on it.

[gugnihr]

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

gugnihr님이 먼저 게시:

You seem very concerned and resentful.
It is not winning if you do it with anger.
MGTOW is not a race and it is not about beating somebody else, MGTOW is only about giving to your own personal interests and personal happines the top priority and not being used by others.
You should leave this kind of incel - like mentality out of it. If you are not happy to go your own way then it means that it was not your own way at all after all.

No, I'm happy that it's happening. It means women can't be entitled to things anymore.

You might be happy, but it sounds like you are also angry anyway. This is not MGTOW, it is something else.

[RRW359]

gugnihr님이 먼저 게시:

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

Men aren't approaching women anymore. Women picked the bear.

You seem very concerned and resentful.
It is not winning if you do it with anger.
MGTOW is not a race and it is not about beating somebody else, MGTOW is only about giving to your own personal interests and personal happines the top priority and not being used by others.
You should leave this kind of incel - like mentality out of it. If you are not happy to go your own way then it means that it was not your own way at all after all.

Are there MGTOW's that aren't sexist? I've only heard of them on here and it seems to be a central part of their ideology, especially since the acronym emphasizes men.

[Chocobo & Moogle]

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

No, I'm happy that it's happening. It means women can't be entitled to things anymore.

To be honest, you seem to be rather frustrated that you can't find a female partner to have a good and happy relationship with, hence you are evading to hate, to try to find some sort of higher purpose in your failure rather than facing the actual problem and trying to work on it.

I don't need a partner taking my money I earned.

[SvarogX]

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

To be honest, you seem to be rather frustrated that you can't find a female partner to have a good and happy relationship with, hence you are evading to hate, to try to find some sort of higher purpose in your failure rather than facing the actual problem and trying to work on it.

I don't need a partner taking my money I earned.

Despite the fact that I doubt you earn any money, I am just gonna say that THIS is one strong indication of what is wrong with your believe on women.

You generalise ALL women and think they ALL want your money.

You probably have made some bad experiences, perhaps you surround yourself simply with the wrong women, either way, its not going to do you any good going through life with this attitude.

Never in my life did I meet a man who is genuinely happy without women in their lives (unless they are simply gay).

[Chocobo & Moogle]

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

No, I'm happy that it's happening. It means women can't be entitled to things anymore.

To be honest, you seem to be rather frustrated that you can't find a female partner to have a good and happy relationship with, hence you are evading to hate, to try to find some sort of higher purpose in your failure rather than facing the actual problem and trying to work on it.

Women have their own jobs now, but they still want a $200 dinner, lol

[SvarogX]

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

To be honest, you seem to be rather frustrated that you can't find a female partner to have a good and happy relationship with, hence you are evading to hate, to try to find some sort of higher purpose in your failure rather than facing the actual problem and trying to work on it.

Women have their own jobs now, but they still want a $200 dinner, lol

I have never met a woman that wants a 200 $ dinner to be honest. In fact, all women I have met were very happy and impressed that I personally cooked for them in my flat. Especially American women found this to be very amazing as most American men don't seem to be able to cook anything beyond a frozen pizza

[Chocobo & Moogle]

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

I don't need a partner taking my money I earned.

Despite the fact that I doubt you earn any money, I am just gonna say that THIS is one strong indication of what is wrong with your believe on women.

You generalise ALL women and think they ALL want your money.

You probably have made some bad experiences, perhaps you surround yourself simply with the wrong women, either way, its not going to do you any good going through life with this attitude.

Never in my life did I meet a man who is genuinely happy without women in their lives (unless they are simply gay).

All women want money (resources). Even in the past they married for money.

[gugnihr]

RRW359님이 먼저 게시:

gugnihr님이 먼저 게시:

You seem very concerned and resentful.
It is not winning if you do it with anger.
MGTOW is not a race and it is not about beating somebody else, MGTOW is only about giving to your own personal interests and personal happines the top priority and not being used by others.
You should leave this kind of incel - like mentality out of it. If you are not happy to go your own way then it means that it was not your own way at all after all.

Are there MGTOW's that aren't sexist? I've only heard of them on here and it seems to be a central part of their ideology, especially since the acronym emphasizes men.

Society have always been VERY sexist, in the past even more than now, MGTOW is simply a consequence of this. Some MGTOW can be sexist, nobody is perfect, but the point is not to get revenge or something like that the point is to become "emotionally" independent enough to put your own interests and well being in first place and avoid relationships that, because of laws and society bias, could become too dangerous and harmful for your well being.

[SvarogX]

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

Despite the fact that I doubt you earn any money, I am just gonna say that THIS is one strong indication of what is wrong with your believe on women.

You generalise ALL women and think they ALL want your money.

You probably have made some bad experiences, perhaps you surround yourself simply with the wrong women, either way, its not going to do you any good going through life with this attitude.

Never in my life did I meet a man who is genuinely happy without women in their lives (unless they are simply gay).

All women want money (resources). Even in the past they married for money.

A woman perhaps wants a man that is financially stable, which is perfectly fine and normal as she might gets pregnant and then nees some back up and support to raise the child. Its existential and necessary.

But this does not mean a man must pay super expensive dinners and give her money of some sort, not how it works at all.

Wanting a financial stable partner does not mean you " want money ".

I am going to assume that you have never been in a relationship and still live with mommy and daddy.

[SvarogX]

!X_Jolly_Cooperation_X!님이 먼저 게시:

gugnihr님이 먼저 게시:

You might be happy, but it sounds like you are also angry anyway. This is not MGTOW, it is something else.

It truly is something else. It is growth. Through pain and suffering comes growth. I am on a s/emen retention journey. I am so far 312 days of no m/asturbation and no sex. I have lost so much weight, gained muscle definition, and have such clearity of mind that it is unbelievable. The reason I'm doing this is because Mike Tyson went on such a journey for 5 years straight, and he became a monster in the ring. I'm almost a year in and understand how he felt. There is so much energy coursing through me, that it can easily turn to joy or rage. If you do what I'm doing, you need to lift weights and beat on a punching bag every now and then, because if you don't you will hurt someone. Trust me, it changes you, and in so many years.

All the guys who are not on some semen retention yet still got succesful and buffed, would like to disagree.

[Chocobo & Moogle]

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

All women want money (resources). Even in the past they married for money.

A woman perhaps wants a man that is financially stable, which is perfectly fine and normal as she might gets pregnant and then nees some back up and support to raise the child. Its existential and necessary.

But this does not mean a man must pay super expensive dinners and give her money of some sort, not how it works at all.

Wanting a financial stable partner does not mean you " want money ".

I am going to assume that you have never been in a relationship and still live with mommy and daddy.

Lol, I've had a relationship. I don't want kids either, so I'm glad I'm not dating women.

[SvarogX]

KaibaCorp님이 먼저 게시:

Hagakure님이 먼저 게시:

A woman perhaps wants a man that is financially stable, which is perfectly fine and normal as she might gets pregnant and then nees some back up and support to raise the child. Its existential and necessary.

But this does not mean a man must pay super expensive dinners and give her money of some sort, not how it works at all.

Wanting a financial stable partner does not mean you " want money ".

I am going to assume that you have never been in a relationship and still live with mommy and daddy.

Lol, I've had a relationship. I don't want kids either, so I'm glad I'm not dating women.

Well your experiences seem to have been very bad then, if you dont want kids, don't want to date women anymore.
In fact, whatever you experienced appears to have been extremely traumatizing. My condolences for you, I hope you can move on one day.