Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Tartışma Kuralları ve Yönergeleri
Bu iletiyi bildir
What's really interesting to me right now is that he supposedly appeared in a removed BlackRock ad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjmLqoGRqNo
And there was as good a chance as not he was nuts and this wasn't even about political affiliation. A lot of people, even journalists who should know better, are forgetting that Guiteau, Schrank, Oswald, and Hinckley all acted for personal, generally deranged reasons. It's not a bad idea at all to point out the dangers of political polarization but we need to remember that assassinations can often occur outside of partisan politics.
Also, ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, a lot of people have been banned since last night.
That doesn't mean he isn't a Republican. It means we don't know yet.
However, which is more likely: a registered Republican is the label they registered as, or, a registered Republican is a trans-leftist-antifa-commie like MAGAs are trying to claim?
Reminds me of January 6th. It was simultaneously a false flag operation while also being a great injustice to the participants being tried by the government for "just taking a tour of the building". So which was it? False flag by ANTIFA/CIA? or were those poor patriots unjustly charged?
What happens if we apply Occam's Razor to both situations?
This shooter was a Republican, thus, a Republican shot Donald Trump.
People should stop trolling and spreading misinformation now.
Shame they forgot to wipe his history of denoting to the democrats first. Whoops. I'm sure they will come up with some way to sweep that little factoid under the rug.
Aww, Raint banned again, well this is the only thing a liberal leftist deserves, to be banned.
No misinformation here, the assassination was executed by a leftist anime fanboy.
"I knew MAGAs desperately wanted people to stop talking about project 2025, trump crapping himself during the national debate, Trump's multiple felonies, the SCOTUS expanding presidential immunity to save trump from being charged for undermining the American people and the constitution, and to make Trump a martyr/Messiah figure, but I didn't think they would go with the 'staged assassination route to do it.
Shame they forgot how many cameras we have today, as well as the interviews from rally goers saying the SS+cops ignored warnings that someone was on top of a building. Whoops. I'm sure they'll never stop talking about this since everything else about Trump is an embarrassment to the country."
That's how insane you sound. However, laying out all of Trump's failings next to "Biden says the wrong words sometimes" is hilarious.
Of course the donation trumps his registration.
It's reasonable to believe that somebody who would assassinate a presidential candidate does not want that candidate becoming president no matter what means have to be employed. Registering as a republican to vote for literally any other republican in the primary is fair game. as a first course of action.
Why would anybody donate even just one red cent to a political organization they don't empathize with, let alone fifteen thousand of them? That makes zero sense.
So, Trump's a Democrat?
He may have been in the period from 1989 to 2010, during which time he donated $175,860 but his donations to the party began decreasing in 2011[ballotpedia.org]. That decrease in donations may've indicated the genesis of dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party's policies and the beginning of a switch in affilations to the Republican Party.
He did donate to the Clinton foundation too, but he cited personal relations with the Clintons as his reason for that. You have to remember that they used to be friends[www.nytimes.com], at least to the point where they attended each-other's wedding functions. Speaking of which, if you are attending Clinton family functions, then it seems rather likely to me that you might be a democrat.
If you can prove the kid was peer pressured into making the Act Blue donation by a friend, then I would accept that a valid enough alternative reason, but the only thing I know about Thomas Crook's private life is that he was allegedly a target for bullying, and that he lived in what is largely considered to be Red Team territory, so in the absence of such evidence, I'm finding that rather unlikely.
Moreover, people are allowed to change their minds, and I've known political converts. However it probably does not just happen overnight. It sounds like something that may have happened over the course of four or five years with Trump, and very late into Trump's life. Thomas Crooks was still young, and it was only three years since the donation.
Plus y'know, actions speak louder than words. Shooting at the Republican presidential candidate mitigates greatly against republican affilations. Similarly, running as a republican and pushing through republican favored political policies mitigates greatly against being a democrat.
Right now we only have three things to go by:
As I already mentioned, the first can be easily explained away by the guy being a republican in name only aiming to sabotage his chances in the primaries. Shooting at your own party's presidential candidate and donating to Act Blue are not.
P.S. I forgot to mention that in 2011, Trump started making donations to the republican party.