Todas as discussões > Fóruns Steam > Off Topic > Detalhes do tópico
Sex Alarm (Banido(a)) 13/jul./2024 às 12:17
What's your opinion on anti-natalism?
What's your opinion on anti-natalism?
< >
Exibindo comentários 115 de 77
volusat 13/jul./2024 às 12:24 
a eugenics puppeteer donates to this movements
Heitor Villa-Lobos 13/jul./2024 às 12:39 
Eugeny, up there with "genic therapy".
kingjames488 13/jul./2024 às 12:39 
I'm not familiar with the label.
Faiyez 13/jul./2024 às 12:43 
I think it's a stillborn movement.
Heitor Villa-Lobos 13/jul./2024 às 12:45 
higher scolarship and better oppprtunities will make people have less children anyways. Its not like there has to be a policy for diminishing human population. We need policies for improving quality of life.

Besides, we can produce orders of magnitude more food, if we move away from livestock to a more vegetable based alimentation (not everyone vegetarian, but reducing by a vast amount the intake of animal products). 70% of all grains go to feed livestock, and in Brazil, the main cause of deflorestation is to create more soy (for livestock on other contries) and pastures for cattle. On the other hand, it has been proven we can regenerate degraded areas with other plantation systems (agroforests).

We think we're so evolved, but we already can see some barbaric practices of our times (fossil fuels, extreme amount of meat intake, huge data parks only for "crypto", AI and personal data mining...)
kingjames488 13/jul./2024 às 13:17 
Escrito originalmente por Heitor Villa-Lobos:
higher scolarship and better oppprtunities will make people have less children anyways. Its not like there has to be a policy for diminishing human population. We need policies for improving quality of life.

Besides, we can produce orders of magnitude more food, if we move away from livestock to a more vegetable based alimentation (not everyone vegetarian, but reducing by a vast amount the intake of animal products). 70% of all grains go to feed livestock, and in Brazil, the main cause of deflorestation is to create more soy (for livestock on other contries) and pastures for cattle. On the other hand, it has been proven we can regenerate degraded areas with other plantation systems (agroforests).

We think we're so evolved, but we already can see some barbaric practices of our times (fossil fuels, extreme amount of meat intake, huge data parks only for "crypto", AI and personal data mining...)
who needs more children when you can just import working-age adults?

and as an added bonus your infant mortality rate drops to almost 0 increasing the "average life expectancy"!

aren't global politics fun for the locals? :D
Última edição por kingjames488; 13/jul./2024 às 13:18
Grendalcat 13/jul./2024 às 13:30 
Escrito originalmente por kingjames488:
I'm not familiar with the label.

From the wiki article:

"Antinatalism or anti-natalism is a family of philosophical views that are critical of reproduction — they consider coming into existence as it exists presently is immoral. Antinatalists thus argue that humans should abstain from having children. Antinatalist views are not necessarily limited only to humans but may encompass all sentient creatures, arguing that coming into existence is a harm for sentient beings in general."

As to the question, I am not an antinatalist. But I didn't have children either.🙃
kingjames488 13/jul./2024 às 13:34 
Escrito originalmente por Grendalcat:
Escrito originalmente por kingjames488:
I'm not familiar with the label.

From the wiki article:

"Antinatalism or anti-natalism is a family of philosophical views that are critical of reproduction — they consider coming into existence as it exists presently is immoral. Antinatalists thus argue that humans should abstain from having children. Antinatalist views are not necessarily limited only to humans but may encompass all sentient creatures, arguing that coming into existence is a harm for sentient beings in general."

As to the question, I am not an antinatalist. But I didn't have children either.🙃
that sounds ridiculous...

that being said I also don't plan on having children simply because I find children to be insufferable and would rather claw my genitals off...
Última edição por kingjames488; 13/jul./2024 às 13:35
vkobe 13/jul./2024 às 13:34 
Escrito originalmente por Sex Alarm:
What's your opinion on anti-natalism?
nun are so hot
TERRONE 13/jul./2024 às 13:36 
Escrito originalmente por Hardbasschenko:
Is this against Natalia?
It's against Christmas and Christianity
Buon Natale
Grendalcat 13/jul./2024 às 13:40 
This may sum up the antinatalist attitude:

Antinatalist sentiments have existed for thousands of years. Some of the earliest surviving formulations of the idea that it would be better not to have been born can be found in ancient Greece. One example is from Sophocles's Oedipus at Colonus, written shortly before Sophocles's death in 406 BC:

"Not to be born is, beyond all estimation, best; but when a man has seen the light of day, this is next best by far, that with utmost speed he should go back from where he came. For when he has seen youth go by, with its easy merry-making, what hard affliction is foreign to him, what suffering does he not know? Envy, factions, strife, battles, and murders. Last of all falls to his lot old age, blamed, weak, unsociable, friendless, wherein dwells every misery among miseries"
Xautos 13/jul./2024 às 13:48 
More extreme case of Existential Nihilism is ever there was one. The pointlessness of Human existence and what any of it stands for.
gugnihr 13/jul./2024 às 14:12 
Anti natalism is right: it is really unfair and irresponsible to give birth to people without their consent and for obvious reasons you cannot have their consent before giving birth to them.
On top of that the natural laws of the universe we live in are very harsh and cruel.
And also children are a very heavy burden that will completely destroy your lifestyle... if not your life as a whole.
Honestly I cannot imagine even just one single positive reason to give birth... except the usual lies, naive fantasies and brainwash. But those are just lies and naive idiocies, not real, relevant and positive reasons.
It is bad for the newborn, it is bad for the parents, and everybody will be forced to die at some point anyway so what's the point? It is just pointless cruelty.
76561199555487730 13/jul./2024 às 14:15 
Im all for it! Especially in third world and under developed countries. if you can support your population and constantly stricken with famin, lack of clean drinking water, etc then youre people dont need to be reproducinga smaller population will solve most of their problems
kingjames488 13/jul./2024 às 14:20 
Escrito originalmente por gugnihr:
Anti natalism is right: it is really unfair and irresponsible to give birth to people without their consent
when you put it like that... it's almost like some sort of abuse!
< >
Exibindo comentários 115 de 77
Por página: 1530 50

Todas as discussões > Fóruns Steam > Off Topic > Detalhes do tópico
Publicado em: 13/jul./2024 às 12:17
Mensagens: 74