Zainstaluj Steam
zaloguj się
|
język
简体中文 (chiński uproszczony)
繁體中文 (chiński tradycyjny)
日本語 (japoński)
한국어 (koreański)
ไทย (tajski)
български (bułgarski)
Čeština (czeski)
Dansk (duński)
Deutsch (niemiecki)
English (angielski)
Español – España (hiszpański)
Español – Latinoamérica (hiszpański latynoamerykański)
Ελληνικά (grecki)
Français (francuski)
Italiano (włoski)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonezyjski)
Magyar (węgierski)
Nederlands (niderlandzki)
Norsk (norweski)
Português (portugalski – Portugalia)
Português – Brasil (portugalski brazylijski)
Română (rumuński)
Русский (rosyjski)
Suomi (fiński)
Svenska (szwedzki)
Türkçe (turecki)
Tiếng Việt (wietnamski)
Українська (ukraiński)
Zgłoś problem z tłumaczeniem
What i know people are mostly doing: Call of Duty, Battlefield, Fifa. *shrug* :D
{LINK USUNIĘTY}http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Call_of_Duty_(video_game)
{LINK USUNIĘTY}http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medal_of_Honor:_Allied_Assault
Zinnoy & Zoey - Thanks for the recommendations; I have heard good things about Civilization V. Did you learn things while playing? Did you actually look at the encyclopedia - is it necessary for gameplay?
hrendon - Thanks for your recommendations; I do believe commercial games can have educational value (and may be more self-motivating than educational games). Would you suggest Call of Duty to be used in a history class about the War? I suppose, if films like Pearl Harbor (horrible film) is used, it's possible to use a biased game, right? As long as media literacy is taught (including teaching students how to think critically), do you think CoD can work?
The encyclopedia is not necessary for gameplay. I did look at it a lot but that is solely because of my interest in history. It has detailed but not extremely long descriptions on all nations and historical leaders in the game, which is a great source for gaining some basic knowledge of a country and its important historical events and influences. But again, it is not necessary for gameplay, it is just there to read if you feel like it. The gameplay itself is much more about diplomacy, development and war.
Pearl harbor is indeed a terrible movie (Showing Japanese bombing hospitals etc. which never happened) but it is useful to use as a source for gaining some basic knowledge about the event itself. CoD however, (and now i am mostly talking about part 5, World At War) is in my opinion not the best source for history. True, it does give you some information about events and what happened, but since you play solely from an allied point of view, you never learn anything about the axis and their view on the war. i think that a movie like Letters from Iwo Jima is perfect for teaching people to think critically and looking at the war from different points of view, but i have never heard of games that allow you to view the second world war from different points of view. If you do find games that show the war from different points of view however, i do believe that they could actually be useful for teaching you how to think critically about such things.
One project you may want ot learn about is the Open TTD project where the author of Transport Tycoon Deluxe gave permission to his fans to mod his game. Then even allowed them to make a whole new open source version. openttd.org is teh site and on there you will find many programmers have ported the game to other platforms and extended its featrures.
The game has educational value in that it teaches resource mangement and traffic control of vrious types of vehicles. ships and aircraft. There is buying and selling of shares too. So some business experience can be learned.