安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
it's like any other artwork , it's only a copyright infrigment if it's look too close and similar to an already made copyrighted artwork , this is something which is not set in stone and is a case by case scenario and usually goes beyond just having a similar art style.
it's like if you where to publish a comic done by an A.I and this A.I decided to just Draw Batman the same exact way that Frank Miller drew it in his work then it would be a copyright infrigment if you tried to publish it , not matter how the A.I came to produce it.
Why not? It's at least close.
Some which happens to be copyrighted.
Fancy language doesn't change that.
Would be interesting tbh. If it can do it with images, why not music?
That would be cool
Arts (such as paintings, music, literature) has emotion put into it by a human, AI can't do that as it has no emotional capability.
For example if Elvis Presley had written a song, lyrics and music but never recorded it then I don't see a problem with AI showing us what it would sound like. But just creating brand new music with an AI is a bit ♥♥♥♥ imo.
UK has one.
You say that, but there's lots of good AI art which you would appreciate just the same. You would have no idea if it wasn't mentioned to you that it was made by AI.
Autotune sounds bad but it is used quite a lot right now and lots of people are not opposed to listening to it.
Well, no, executions is still on the artist, even if execution is NOT all the thing depending on artist you can just except you can go without it.
Abstract example: being a programmes is not only about writing code, but if person does something only related to programmers (come up with idea for programm) without actually doing the most important part - writing the code, he isn't a programmer.
It's not an automation, lmao, it's a replacement.
If you draw on PC and print it, you just transfer the same picture from one medium to another.
If sculptor uses 3D printer, he still codes how exactly, where and how much of every volume should be placed. He can do it with wood, marble, stone, plastiline, he's just picked 3D printer.
The things you described is a question of medium.
If artist/commissioner relationships is like a cook/client, then sculptor using a 3D-printer instead of using clay or 3D-programm is like cook that roast a chicken instead of boiling or braising it.