Would you rather have:

[Dwolfin]

Unlimited bacon, but no more video games
or
Games, unlimited games, but no games?

[HarleyIsntReal]

What?

[ṼṏẌṏḭḊ]

The second option is broken.

[Et tu, B?]

uhh, so what does picking "games, unlimited games, but no games", cause, exactly?

[Dwolfin]

Originally posted by GageTheSpartan:

What?

let me make this crystal clear, I believe I have messed up.

You can have unlimited bacon, but no more video games,

or

Games, (they are unlimited) but no games.

[Dwolfin]

Originally posted by Et tu, B?:

uhh, so what does picking "games, unlimited games, but no games", cause, exactly?

You have unlimited games

[Tsubame ⭐]

You can have unlimited games, but no games? That does not even make sense.

[The Commendatore]

Originally posted by 🐬 Dwolfin 🐺:

Games, (they are unlimited) but no games.

bruh...

[Dwolfin]

Originally posted by Tsubame ⭐:

You can have unlimited games, but no games? That does not even make sense.

sure it does, you have unlimited games.

[Jonathan Sensei]

So I can have crunchy pig bits and no video-games, or unlimited video-games but no board or card games?

[mimizukari]

Originally posted by 🐬 Dwolfin 🐺:

Games, unlimited games, but no games?

This is a paradoxical statement that could have different interpretations depending on the context and the intention of the speaker. One possible interpretation is that the speaker is using games as a metaphor for something else, such as choices, opportunities, or challenges. In this case, the statement could mean that you have many options to choose from, but none of them are satisfying or meaningful. Another possible interpretation is that the speaker is using games as a literal term for entertainment or recreation. In this case, the statement could mean that you have access to many games, but you are not allowed to play them or enjoy them. This could be a form of punishment, restriction, or irony. A third possible interpretation is that the speaker is using games as a rhetorical device to create confusion or contradiction. In this case, the statement could mean that the speaker is not being serious or honest, and is trying to provoke a reaction or a response from you. This could be a form of humor, sarcasm, or manipulation.

Either way, both of the options suck and I want video games that I can play and enjoy.

[craigsters]

I'll choose unlimited bacon games

[Dwolfin]

Originally posted by craigsters:

I'll choose unlimited bacon games

great choice sir.

[Out Of Bubblegum]

I would rather have you fix your original post.
:)

[Dwolfin]

Originally posted by ロザリンド:

Originally posted by 🐬 Dwolfin 🐺:

Games, unlimited games, but no games?

This is a paradoxical statement that could have different interpretations depending on the context and the intention of the speaker. One possible interpretation is that the speaker is using games as a metaphor for something else, such as choices, opportunities, or challenges. In this case, the statement could mean that you have many options to choose from, but none of them are satisfying or meaningful. Another possible interpretation is that the speaker is using games as a literal term for entertainment or recreation. In this case, the statement could mean that you have access to many games, but you are not allowed to play them or enjoy them. This could be a form of punishment, restriction, or irony. A third possible interpretation is that the speaker is using games as a rhetorical device to create confusion or contradiction. In this case, the statement could mean that the speaker is not being serious or honest, and is trying to provoke a reaction or a response from you. This could be a form of humor, sarcasm, or manipulation.

Either way, both of the options suck and I want video games that I can play and enjoy.

its not an easy question, or answer.

[Dwolfin]

Originally posted by Out Of Bubblegum:

I would rather have you fix your original post.
:)

theres nothing to fix, there is the option of unlimited bacon, but no video games, or games, unlimited games, but no games.