Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Ok, on a serious note, I don't see any problems with data miners. If a developer releases unknown future content in a update then it's on the developer. The developer knows full well people will data mine the files to see what is stuff is coming to the game.
This happens on fallout 76, the community has dedicated people who data mine the games files and release what content is coming further down the line
My opinion is "low." Not because of what they do, but for the uses their product is put to. They know, yet still sell it...
That's only as far as publicly available info is used. If they cross-the-line, they're dogpoop level.
This is a shadowy world. The more one discovers, the darker it gets. It doesn't serve dataminers well for their practices to be exposed to the public eye.
I think that the managing partners of such companies should submit all their own private data, use, and travel habits, into the data streams they sell... But, you know, I bet that has never happened.
Noe: I am not in favor of "customer information is a business product and can be sold separately" legal rulings. This is a difficult problem that needs to be solved.
For instance, customer information is included when a business is sold to someone else, so it is legally an "asset." I have no issue with that. I do have issue with, for example, an online pet food, toy, and supply company selling their customer data to a miner who then sells it to a collator who then offers it as a target product so a private investigator can find someone for a client and then that client is an ex-husband who wants to harass his ex-wife... or worse. Oh, the tangled web we weave when first we look to sell other people's privacy.
However, if your physician is retiring, it actually helps you when they sell their practice's patient list to qualified physicians that can then take you into their practice. (US, but even that practice is kind of rare these days as Health Insurance companies are the decision-makers.
Collecting data about applications, and how its running on different hardware, is fine.
Collecting data on PEOPLE, is not ok and we need significantly stronger regulations on it.
ALT +F4
Saint Isidore is facepalming.
Oh I see, sorry I was mistaken. I believe that kind of data mining should be made illegal.
my mining level is 99