My Girlfriend is Trans and I'm Not Gay

[Republic of Lamers]

https://youtu.be/kXjnWenfnqQ?si=RySch8g-uon_2o1f


Thoughts?

[Grim Reaper]

legalize gay sex marriage

[videogames10]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Synburn:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von videogames10:

Mine don't have holes. Is that normal? Am I deformed?

Better ask your doctor, sounds bad.

Good advice. I'll schedule an appointment first thing in the morning. In the meantime I'll see if I can poke them open with a toothpick.

[ℭycaleo]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pierce Dalton:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Synburn:

The physiology of men theoretically allows this to happen in all cases (without being abnormal).



Claim. I could just as easily claim the opposite.

You could claim the opposite, yes, but you can't find a gay people that did such thing.

So gay are better than all other? That's exactly the point isn't it?

Look, I have nothing against gays (so on). I support them in many cases. Against extremes and untruths on other hand...

Ursprünglich geschrieben von videogames10:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Synburn:

Better ask your doctor, sounds bad.

Invaluable advice. I'll schedule an appointment first thing in the morning. In the meantime I'll see if I can open them up with a toothpick.

Take a corkscrew, better yet, get a girlfriend.

[Sigma957]

And you are what, seeking validation for your choice?

[Pierce Dalton]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Synburn:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pierce Dalton:

You could claim the opposite, yes, but you can't find a gay people that did such thing.

So gay are better than all other? That's exactly the point isn't it?

No, they CAN be better parents than certain straight couples.

[Under there]

we get it, you like men

[ZZZZZ]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Pierce Dalton:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Synburn:

So gay are better than all other? That's exactly the point isn't it?

No, they CAN be better parents than certain straight couples.

those who adopt are very likely to be better parents since u needa fullfill quite a lot of things for adoption

[Kamiyama]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von GoDevils!:

He is gay.

^ this

I wonder if these same weirdos are the ones who keep saying making love to a tomboy makes a man gay.

A person's style doesn't determine their gender. Gender is not fluid.

[ZZZZZ]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Kamiyama:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von GoDevils!:

He is gay.

^ this

I wonder if these same weirdos are the ones who keep saying making love to a tomboy makes a man gay.

A person's style doesn't determine their gender. Gender is not fluid.

dunno, gay is currently nothing more than a social label, lets not forget that people just changed the meaning of it a while ago and it might be just temporary align with things like homosexuality.. in 10years gay could mean all men who have a beard

[Sigma957]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von ZZZZZ:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Kamiyama:

^ this

I wonder if these same weirdos are the ones who keep saying making love to a tomboy makes a man gay.

A person's style doesn't determine their gender. Gender is not fluid.

dunno, gay is currently nothing more than a social label, lets not forget that people just changed the meaning of it a while ago and it might be just temporary align with things like homosexuality.. in 10years gay could mean all men who have a beard

It will mean happy again.

[Tiberius]

Lmao wtf

[JusticeForPantySniffers]

I like how no one can even think for a second before leaving a comment.

How does liking a person for their feminine features consider as gay, So I guess it all depending what they have in their pants because I assume everyone forget that you can have fake vagina.

[[unassigned]]

people overthink this stuff when its so simple. if two consenting adults want to do stuff to eachother its not really anyone else's business.
wondering if: "oh no is this gay?" is so dumb. who actually cares? why would ontology take precedence over being happy?
just do whatever. we're on a speck of dust floating in an infinite nothingness for so short a time that its beyond meaningless, why you getting hung up on some category made up by some Oxbridge prick?
Like if you think "couldnt be me" thats fine, but it doesnt make either you or the other person wrong or right, its just a preference you had no actual control over.
As far as i can tell there are only 2 categories: people who are capable of being true with themselves and others who are egotistically over concerned with what is Right and what is Wrong as if they are some divinely enlightened arbiters of absolute truth (aka sociopathic narcissists)

[Pierce Dalton]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Adrian347895:

I like how no one can even think for a second before leaving a comment.

How does liking a person for their feminine features consider as gay, So I guess it all depending what they have in their pants because I assume everyone forget that you can have fake vagina.

Yeah, if that dude were gay maybe he would date someone that looks like a man, not a woman... it's actually funny how people don't realize something that simple.

[Talby]

This just proves how small the real trans community actually is, and how very few trans woman can actually pull it off. That is not the problem.

The problem is the groupthink the trans activist community uses to normalize (and legalize) hate and violence against the non-trans community, with the veneer of a social justice agenda to "protect" the LGBT+ community. That is why the last few mass shootings were focused on Christian schools.