Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The author of this topic has marked a post as the answer to their question.
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
I thought everyone knew this by now.
Its reaction with oxygen is explosively exothermic. The pressurized conditions inside a jet engine allow jet fuel to burn at very high temperatures. At room temperature and pressure, jet fuel burns at around 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit.
type into google how hot does jet fuel burn and you'll get a bunch of sites mentioning this
Face book deleted the video links debunking this, I wonder why?
A limit the damage thing. That can't be admitted, because it was innocent citizens being killed.
There's also the case of the "building 7" that wasn't hit by a plane so there was no fuel involved...
A building hitting another building will cause damage to it. Building 7 Explained: The Tube That Crumpled explains why both WTC 1, 2 and 7 collapsed. Building 1 hit building 7 as it collapsed and burning debris from building 1 started the fires as well as causing damage from the parapet to ground level and at least 1/3rd of the southwest corner of the building was damaged, starting from the 18th floor[lh4.googleusercontent.com] that wasn't seen by any news crews.
What was the construction of said building? Was it precast, reinforced concrete? Was it concrete encased steel? That Wikipedia page does not list anything of its construction outside of the exterior cladding, that appears to have issues with fires as noted with other cases of fires using such exteriors.
The video linked above answers the question of what it was made from, and, details other fires in which buildings collapsed or partially collapsed after 9-11-2001.
The floors for WTC1 and 2 used bar joists for the floors. To see what one looks like, just go to your local grocery store or other big box store and look up. The framing one sees up there are open truss girders and bar joists. The WTC used bar joists that had 1" diameter bar stock used for the truss part with angles for the top and bottom chords that are all welded together. One end sits on a girder between columns and the other end is attached to the exterior wall panels as see in this image[www.fireengineering.com]. These were spaced ever 6.7 feet. A good article about this can be found on the The World Trade Center Construction and Collapse, Part 3[www.fireengineering.com] and included actual photos of the installation of the floor trusses in one of the towers and its spray on fire-proofing.
As a structural steel inspector, I have to understand how welds are made, what materials are used in the buildings I inspect as they are erected, which kind of bolts are to be used and how they are to be tightened and how heat can affect steel as well as some metallurgy.
mind = blown.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCzy9i4tIHU
The CIA had vast swathes of the internal command staff being run by outside contractors at the time.
It could easily be a mix of the two, some rogue faction or some legitimate controlling force from outside.
The US and the CIA aren't exactly on good terms at the governmental level.
It can't be admitted because it calls attention to the flight tape, which has been confirmed to have been used to pilot the planes.
It's a really, really hard thing to pull off. They'd have to have sent the Tom Cruise of arabic ace pilots to do what the planes did, and black box data has confirmed that the data signature of the exact tape used in the modeling was present.
So at the very least the US designed an anti-US weapon and then slipped and fell and dropped it on itself. That's the best way that this looks, cartoonish buffoonery.
Sad that people actually believe this nonsense.
Yes.
Usama Bin Laden was on the CIA's payroll at one point and several American groups profited considerably from the clean up from the whole thing, notably gun sales from abject fear of a terror attack, the clean up operation and construction efforts, not to mention the America media that milked the whole thing, but they have always been parasites.
yeah, you have to hit two of those, upside down, with no wings, directly with your fuel tanks.
it's not something that's reasonably possible without automation, and the data of the exact composition of the building is probably only really available in the US. not that the US isn't a hub of spying and capitalism, of course.