安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
i would say there is zero reason to worry about that.
some persons may feel conflicted that way, but history itself shows that people by large are able to keep things like that separate - sometimes even keeping specific creators separate from their works.
so if you want something reassuring, analog horror as a genre is not going to be affected by singular controversies pertaining to singular creators.
you would have to uncover some kind of wide spread conspiracy/controversy spanning genre-wide if people are gonna get turned away from a whole genre.
as mentioned, just look at the history of such things for proof. there are several very famous people in music, movies, etc that have been involved in criminal things and convicted in high profile court cases even.
so while people may not want to be associated with the works of such a creator, that has not meant people has shied away from whatever genre those creators have been active in.
even with the highly publicized and very aggressive efforts of someone like Jack Thompson to paint videogames as a whole in a negative light, people are able to tell things apart like that.
at least enough people that there is no need to worry.