Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
i would say there is zero reason to worry about that.
some persons may feel conflicted that way, but history itself shows that people by large are able to keep things like that separate - sometimes even keeping specific creators separate from their works.
so if you want something reassuring, analog horror as a genre is not going to be affected by singular controversies pertaining to singular creators.
you would have to uncover some kind of wide spread conspiracy/controversy spanning genre-wide if people are gonna get turned away from a whole genre.
as mentioned, just look at the history of such things for proof. there are several very famous people in music, movies, etc that have been involved in criminal things and convicted in high profile court cases even.
so while people may not want to be associated with the works of such a creator, that has not meant people has shied away from whatever genre those creators have been active in.
even with the highly publicized and very aggressive efforts of someone like Jack Thompson to paint videogames as a whole in a negative light, people are able to tell things apart like that.
at least enough people that there is no need to worry.