Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Labor's official purpose is to criticize Britain, argue for the dissolution of the crown, and for the independence of its constituent members. It has charter from the Crown, and although it was granted charter at the same time as the Communist faction, who were literally all imported nazis later declared rogue in the wake of the UFC scandal among many many others, it has been a recognized and present force in the empire since its formation. Sometimes even enjoying the direct endorsement of the entire ruling class, who felt the empire itself was nothing but an evil and a plague upon all lands it touched.
I don't like the CIA, but to play devil's advocate, third world countries generally suck at picking leaders anyway and dysfunctional by nature. Looking at you Cuba, Venezula, and Iran. Whether or not the CIA overthrew their leaders, they were never going to be be stable democracies.
Any more scary than what France has been saying lately?
What western country these days doesn't have the people calling their leaders traitors?
Another result of the machinations of the empire. Owing to..
..their agreement to a zero-sum economy treaty with France in...1906 or so.
Treaty obligations compel Britain to support the concept, even if it's against their immediate interests. The treaty is more important to maintaining their position, as France has become the approximate gatekeeper of England's well-being and good fortune. A fact which has allied most of the EU against them, and the UK against them both.
Although they could leave if they had some alternate guarantuor, such as the US beginning agricultural production en masse, but this runs the risk of turning France beligerent and also galvanizing, organizing, and pressing the EU into conquering the UK in order to preserve the status quo.
Something they'd all want to use a nice beligerent mercenary like Russia for.
Which countries put in place Cuba's, Venezuela's, and Iran's current leaders?
Navy intelligence admiral clearly implicated in JFK, among others.
MKultra was army intelligence, still hanging on. kinda the last straw for cutting ties ultimately. minus DARPA, of course. although they're kind of being replaced by private industry now too, come to think of it.
russia, england, england using russia as a proxy.
Going to need some sources for that one.