安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
If you bring a gamer from 1990 to this day, he will be so overwhelmed and entertained. He will say something like 'You call those great games bad? are you crazy?".
I think what has changed the most is the player's mindset. People are no longer entertained easily. There have been too many influence and expectations.
1. hype train
For example ahh dark souls. ahh fall guys. ahh this and that. Not all games will suit everyone. Those who don't like it would say "ahhh AAA games suck". Don't be lazy, you have to first out if that game suits your taste.
2. High expectations
Simple games such as suzy cube, nobody will give it a try because it's a "low budge indie game with poor graphics". It is a full game with complete maps and puzzles but people no longer bats an eye.
3. Free games
Those are so limited, it's only a few maps with only a few characters, and everything else is boost items with microtransactions, yet people kept giving them a try and only to complain.
4. 10/90 rule
Due to marketing and giant corporation advantage, only 10% of games made it big and 90% of the rest were unheard of, many of them struggled to stay afloat and creative producers die off.
If everyone can change their mindset and see themselves as someone with a mission to seek for their 1 true unique game, things can change. Reviews can gain more weight, more new games and new experience can happen, and you'll see the beauty of today's games made by various engines and creativity. But it is easily said than done..
Bit like red alert counter strike, No one really liked that add on and all it did was give you some new missions and a couple of new maps in skirmish.
And yet they keep buying them. The unholy trinity - EA, Ubisoft, and Activision - continue to see major sales figures at release every year. I remember seeing someone at the Battlefield 2042 launch who was like, "That's the last time I buy anything from EA again." What, now you're saying that? You mean to say that that was the game that finally pushed it over the edge for you, and not any of the other 70 times they did something similar prior?
I think Borderlands 3 best summarizes the gaming community's attitude toward this subject, which is why I keep it in mind to this day, even though I bet everyone else forgot. Before that game released, they came out and straight up told you, "Hey, this game is going to have microtransactions in it." A full-priced AAA game with microtransactions: the big, taboo "thing" in the eyes of customers. The practice that gets vilified to hell and back everywhere online. And yet, what happened to BL3? It was a successful launch; everybody played and enjoyed the game, and moved on from it.
The point there being: people only care about this stuff if it makes the experience worse. If they have fun with the game in spite of greed or game-breaking bugs or any other issues, it doesn't matter to anyone. Oblivion was the trend-setter with horse armor, as people like to credit it. Why did Oblivion get away with it? Because Oblivion was a good game. So people didn't really care - not as much as they might claim, anyway.
Just let people enjoy games that they like ( as long as they don't have any scandals about it)
Anyway, games like CSGO are from 2012, and they have a lot of microtransactions
Because modern gamers are never satisfied, they run trough games without taking the time to see how hard devs worked on the graphics and sh**... Shame
Electronic Arts was a great one until the former CEO of Pepsi took the lead in 2003.
Epic Games started to behave in a really detesting way ever since Tencent started to involve there.
Global actors ruin everything they touch. Because they have their OWN agendas to shoehorn masses into a "vision". Most of the time, that vision is corrupt.
Why are those Indie games have still some soul more often than not? because they don't have an ULTERIOR agenda.
Fortunately, there are many big enough Studios that are not corrupted and stayed firm. I won't give names here as those corrupted Globalists may plan to harm them.
Nothing wrong with modern games. I know that is a shock gasp.
OP has no idea what gaming used to be.
Yeah some gamers i really wonder about, The new jagged alliance 3 is supposed to be giving the fans what they asked for but i still see threads saying people won't buy it.
They still say it's not in the spirit that JA2 was, I mean they will never be happy, may as well take JA2 and place a 3 over it and then the fans will be happy.
I'm happy with plenty of games but some people just can't be pleased.
The only games I've played that has good art and graphics are: little nightmares, mirror's edge series, bioshock series, and some roblox games.
May be for point transfer?
I buy many old arcade games on PS/Switch/Xbox, but most likely I play 1-2H and get satisfied.
I prefer latest games for playing daily.