The irony about "grooming"

[Shodan]

I just love it when the very people who can't stop saying things like "LEAVE THE CHILDREN ALONE", "STAY AWAY FROM OUR CHILDREN", "THE CHILDREN ARE OFF LIMITS", "LET CHILDREN BE CHILDREN, CHILDHOOD IS INNOCENCE" ironically send their children to church which is basically the international HQ of child rape and that's an open secret at this point.

It actually makes perfect sense when you think about it:

Why would a man completely give up normal life and marriage (to women) and instead choose confinement with a bunch of other men, as well as children with whom they have private one-on-one meetings, hmm? That was a rhetorical question, by the way, I hope I don't have to say that explicitly too because the answer couldn't be more obvious.

On a side note, speaking of innocence and degeneracy... What's with the constant fascination about sexualization of children? How come that of all things, you always instantly assume the worst (maybe it's not the worst to you, though) when it comes to children? I thought you were perfectly normal people who are strongly against all those perverted ideas? Oh well...

Anyway...

How come, not just that I don't see the same "grooming" and other complaints about this massive worldwide problem from the same people who like to complain about this "grooming" so much, but they even send their children to such places? Like I said, this is basically an open secret, an undeniable problem which is so bad that it is even acknowledged not only on a local level absolutely everywhere, but even in Vatican City. Just a Catholic thing, you say? Yeah, no, it even exists outside of Christianity as a whole, like that recent issue with the Dalai Lama.

[pants]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Dracoco OwO:

I was speaking within the context of the sentance not about the word on it's own but alright.

I am very sorry, and totally my bad, it's just one of those threads where chaos reigns

edit for typing threats and not threads. I promise I am not making any threats. xo

[kingjames488]

OH GAWD!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phSxxVJCZsc

funny how god is always involved tho O.o

[Polverrati]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Shodan:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Corthmic:

I was never using the term "grooming" in the legal sense you ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ nitwit, if you perceived it that way it's YOUR problem. Regardless, all your doing is deflecting. You have nothing of value to say about my actual point, so now it's "YOU USE WORD WRONG" because you have nothing. You're a dishonest moron, nothing more. Now either give me an actual point or I'm gonna do what the tree providing you oxygen should do and ignore you.

So, are we talking about brushing horses here then? That's also grooming. Why don't you think of "trans agenda" as brushing horses when you talk about grooming? Why?

You are not in the position to ask me to answer your "actual points", you have none, you'll never have any because you're not capable of understanding the most basic ♥♥♥♥, I'm the one who made points and even if you made any, I made them first, you're just avoiding the topic and making it seem like it's the other way round, but it's not.

Back to the horse, of course you're too afraid to have an actual discussion when I called you out.

You're a dishonest, projecting, cowardly piece of filth and we're done here.

[pants]

Yes, back to the horse. Back to me. I am an oasis of incoherent calm. Please love me. And also groom me. No not in that way. I've got some lice in my mane.

[Dracoco OwO]

Oprindeligt skrevet af kingjames488:

OH GAWD!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phSxxVJCZsc

funny how god is always involved tho O.o

The kids are supposed to touch his grace after all...

[Swarmfly]

Treating all individual churches, or denominations for that matter, as if they are all one unified body is rather disingenuous to prove a point, don't you think?

[Nekoborg]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zubovnikov:

Treating all individual churches, or denominations for that matter, as if they are all one unified body is rather disingenuous to prove a point, don't you think?

Correct

[Yew Nough]

OP: It's a parenting issue.

No parent should leave their child under the supervision of someone who is not to be trusted, regardless of who they are and what they do for a living.

If parents took it upon themselves to reasonably protect, educate, and supervise their children, you would see less cases such as the ones you're describing, and at the very least: Those affected would be able to get the help they need sooner than later (or never in some cases, which can lead to reciprocating more abuse).

Also: You gotta TL;DR dude

[Shodan]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zubovnikov:

Treating all individual churches, or denominations for that matter, as if they are all one unified body is rather disingenuous to prove a point, don't you think?

Catholic churches are under Vatican City, so they're not exactly individual, and yes, I said it's not just a Catholic thing in the original post, I didn't forget that.

[NW/RL]

Fun thread

[Electric Cupcake]

The very meaning of the word "Catholic" means united and indivisible.

Rather like the monolithic rock that that one guy built his house on in the parable. Jesus called St. Peter the rock that his church was built on, so naturally the Roman church considers it the one true church, by Christ's own word. Never mind that the Coptic and Greek and Ethiopian churches were being formed at the same time, and St. Paul arguably did more to found the church in Rome than Peter did, but whatever.

[Shodan]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Electric Cupcake:

The very meaning of the word "Catholic" means united and indivisible.

Rather like the monolithic rock that that one guy built his house on in the parable. Jesus called St. Peter the rock that his church was built on, so naturally the Roman church considers it the one true church, by Christ's own word. Never mind that the Coptic and Greek and Ethiopian churches were being formed at the same time, and St. Paul arguably did more to found the church in Rome than Peter did, but whatever.

Yeah, explain that to these completely clueless freaks who just blatantly deny everything just because it suits whatever sick ♥♥♥♥ they're trying to push here.

"denoting or relating to the entire body of Christians"

"universal in extent; involving all; of interest to all."

This still isn't enough, they'll always find a way to avoid the topic and invent some total ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

[Swarmfly]

Oprindeligt skrevet af NW/RL:

Fun thread

Any thread that concerns accusing certain groups of people of hypocrisy, whether real or imagined, is certain to be an instant sensation.

[Raelic]

This is not what Irony means and if your defense or point is that someone else is doing it so they shouldn't complain when others do it, that's a nonsequitor.

[kingjames488]

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zubovnikov:

Oprindeligt skrevet af NW/RL:

Fun thread

Any thread that concerns accusing certain groups of people of hypocrisy, whether real or imagined, is certain to be an instant sensation. :aos2nanako:

good thing steam blames whoever started said topic for said hoohaa...