WW3: This is the FIRST Step...

[Venom]

NATO is facing its biggest challenge yet—its most powerful member, the United States, has turned its back on the alliance. With U.S. aid to Ukraine cut off, growing tensions between Washington and its European allies, and even threats of military action against NATO nations, the future of the alliance is uncertain.

What happens when Europe is forced to defend itself without American support? Could NATO survive without the U.S., or is this the beginning of its downfall? And what does this mean for global security as Russia watches and waits for the perfect moment to strike?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9n5RMazUfY

[Affronter]

We live in the best of times, don’t we.

[Kweeb]

what war has Nato ever stopped

[Reddari]

Europe faces no threats.

Wars are cooperative. All states benefit.

[Venom]

Originally posted by Reddari:

Europe faces no threats.

Wars are cooperative. All states benefit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXq0x_ew81I&t=1s

[Venom]

Originally posted by Hawk Tuah:

This post is the result of only reading click grabbing news headlines but not actually engaging with the stories.

The Ukraine war isn't getting much better. If Putin takes Ukraine, will he target Poland next? NATO is supporting Poland.

[Reddari]

The first step for World war 3 was laid down in around 1800s. Probably around the time Russia prevented the first World War. Delayed it almost 80 years. So you see history repeating itself? So far the next one has been succesfully delayed for 80 years also.

[Vote Quimby]

Originally posted by Venom:

Originally posted by Reddari:

Europe faces no threats.

Wars are cooperative. All states benefit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXq0x_ew81I&t=1s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nly1H05yJyo

Maybe they should stop using hospitals as military bases and ambulances as military transport?

[Ulfrinn]

Maybe Europeans need to pick better causes, and stop trying to instigate wars with Russia in the first place. If Europeans are so hungry for a war to feel relevant, than our alliance with them is a liability, and nothing more.

[Ulfrinn]

Originally posted by Vote Quimby:

Originally posted by Venom:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXq0x_ew81I&t=1s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nly1H05yJyo

Maybe they should stop using hospitals as military bases and ambulances as military transport?

Yeah, Ukraine already got called out for human rights violations by using schools, hospitals, and other civilian structures to house military installations. No different than what Hamas does. It actually turns those structures into legitimate military targets. Ukraine is only doing it in hopes it'll make Russia hesitate attacking them and give them an edge. We should not be subsidizing this.

[Reddari]

Originally posted by Ulfrinn:

Originally posted by Vote Quimby:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nly1H05yJyo

Maybe they should stop using hospitals as military bases and ambulances as military transport?

Yeah, Ukraine already got called out for human rights violations by using schools, hospitals, and other civilian structures to house military installations. No different than what Hamas does. It actually turns those structures into legitimate military targets. Ukraine is only doing it in hopes it'll make Russia hesitate attacking them and give them an edge. We should not be subsidizing this.

That is why they call Ukraine "Big Israel".

[vkobe]

Originally posted by Venom:

NATO is facing its biggest challenge yet—its most powerful member, the United States, has turned its back on the alliance. With U.S. aid to Ukraine cut off, growing tensions between Washington and its European allies, and even threats of military action against NATO nations, the future of the alliance is uncertain.

What happens when Europe is forced to defend itself without American support? Could NATO survive without the U.S., or is this the beginning of its downfall? And what does this mean for global security as Russia watches and waits for the perfect moment to strike?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9n5RMazUfY

russia still need many months before to able to conquer full ukraine in hypothesis they can

EU have planty time to build defense line like bunker, underground, mine field

so it is not about EU to win the war, but to not lost it

[ZZZZZ]

lack of US help is the least concern when the world war3 enemy is most likely USA itself

[Reddari]

Originally posted by Venom:

Originally posted by Hawk Tuah:

This post is the result of only reading click grabbing news headlines but not actually engaging with the stories.

The Ukraine war isn't getting much better. If Putin takes Ukraine, will he target Poland next? NATO is supporting Poland.

All the strategic assets are in Ukraine. The biolabs, the DUMBs, the "rare Earth minerals" - aka Roswellian swamp gas.

Ukraine is the center for human trafficicking in Europe, not Poland. The infrastructure to facilitate that and also the infrastrucuture for human engineering, disassembly, processing, chimeric experimentation is centered on Ukraine. Its also the energetic center for the continent.

What does Poland have?

[salamander]

can we just be skipping ww3 and head straight to ww4? i think the technology will be cooler for that one, exo-suits and such.