安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
I find that young men, especially college educated men, like mature women like me.
They can't get enough of me...
A 50 plus year old lady is past her prime years, and most young men aren't going to be attracted to someone like that. A 32-35 year old lady is in her prime. So to speak. The problem is when that lady goes over the 40 year mark its going to be more difficult to attract young men at 50.
Women are valued for their youth and beauty. Men are valued for their status and income. That is how its been for a very long time. But to each their own.
What happened to the guy you dated last week?
I'm at an age where I'm seeing men my age go after 18 year olds because "they don't know better" and it just...sets me off.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntAg8JGmbyA
The female version is getting the best provider she can, preferably wealthy, influential, and easily influenced, and collecting the best genes from the most reproductively successful males for her own offspring. It's not an accident that they write the romances they do, which either include either entirely unrealistic guys, or cheating, and, uh, "forced" fantasies. Reproduction is a powerful drive, to the point where I don't blame furries, or gays, even when they're being more weird than normal. Lots of people have their kinks, I get it.
The problem is that females want the security of an older, more established male to begin with, and you can see this in how they want total financial and physical security, along with only the most "safe adventures" to be guided on, where they feel like they are witnessing the ability of their man to protect and provide for them.
This gets younger guys in a lot of trouble, because they spend more than they have earned, in multiple senses. As it is, young males set out to prove themselves, and while we don't see a lot of them dying in the West, because we don't have many wars or struggles, we do see a lot of them going broke, or just swearing off women altogether because the females ask so much and give so little in return.
Again, you are witnessing female genetic instinct, there. It's to take maximum advantage, which is also why so many females have such a strong desire for leadership and male primacy. They know they're being "bad girls", so they want males to take charge of them and love them, so they get everything they want. But of course, that comes within the confines of what they are comfortable with, hence the incredibly long lists of demands females have, and how they are often seemingly so self-contradictory.
Males can be the same way, if they aren't already directed and purposeful. Just listen to soy-boys or those who have fallen victim to the idea of being trans. Not actual trans, just pretending to be. It's basically a hedonism list. Hippies and the like do the same.
We have functioning societies and traditions to prevent precisely this kind of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥. Things like arranged marriages and chivalry exist because they serve well, and no, they don't usually include marrying young and untested men to women that want security and provision. That would be retarded.
Aside from stupid social engineering with unintended consequences, the only reason this stuff is considered somewhat acceptable is because of Liberalism. Actual Liberalism, based on meritocracy. Not the ind that demands government control and calls that Liberalism.
It is often seen that a young man getting an older woman is proof of his merit, for no other reason than that he must have been so appealing to that woman. What a champ, right? Biologically, he could be, and instinct is powerful. Except it doesn't work that way all the time, and usually doesn't. Indeed, the reverse ends up being true, and predictably so, because the female is also looking for advantage,when she has no better alternatives, and so we have a case of statutory rape.
There really is no solution to this in a free society, beyond people choosing what they think works best, and what is proven to. Juries decide individual cases, and people choose individually who they think is guilty. Normally, they do a great job, because even if they don't know anything I've mentioned, they have a keen perception of deception. If and when they fail en-masse, as is always the case with the Far Left, they start learning.
But in general, no I don't think it's a good idea, and if my son ever comes home with some older woman, she's getting an interrogation that she won't even know is happening. Actually, that's true in every instance, son or daughter, boyfriend or girlfriend, but it still applies in this case.
Sorry but I doubt that 8 pages on a dating topic (about age to boot) is going anywhere healthy so I'll skip that part.
Your question is moot, and already wrong. It's not a matter of should, period. There are tons of things to argue about it but should has no place in this. Even if we were to talk about how all involved individuals should have sovereignty over their own decisions, none of this should be a question, or be up for debate.
The premise of everything concerning more than one individual is IMPERATIVE to include all parties' enthusiastic consent. Otherwise you might as well ask "Under what circumstances is rape acceptable?" and let's just say there is no valid answer to this other than NEVER. Though I fear that there is more than just a minimal amount of people who would object so it does bear repeating...and quite frankly, is the main motivation of this comment in the first place.
Personally I even question people's motivations when I see the oulined aspect of "more younger men are now dating older women", as well as that "study" and everything, and no I haven't checked the link because it already looks dubious and sorry but OP doesn't look to be the most sincere either.
Bottom line is, people should date who is willing to date them. If we're looking at this from a female empowering standpoint, I'm all for it. History is full of rapey dudes who abuse younger women and girls...women and girls are generally seeking relationships of all kinds far more on eye level than their male counterparts do, so the age question is already a very different one from that standpoint alone. So them looking a little more south on the age range is nowhere near as questinable as it is the case with dudes.
From personal experience...hmmm...I'm trying to say something that is not too telling...well, let's just say, meeting someone on eye level and respecting them every step of the way was never to anybody's detriment. Wild concept, I know.
When all that is left of us are bones, sitting in the graves for maybe a thousand years or more, the future generation and relationships will be easy; when we look at games like Detroit Become Human, that will be a reality. This is the path we're headed to, but of course, they'd have a better version.
Nowadays, we put up with women for a lot of things. Their periods, mood, drama, agendas, luggage etc. When we divorce them, we lose half our belongings along with a great deal of time sorting out court details, alimony, and custody of children.
Whereas that future, men don't have to put up with women. There will be AI women that will do anything they want. They can customize their faces, personalities, height etc. These AI women will clean, cook, and always be loyal. They look and feel real. The only downside is that they can't give birth.