Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
I'm done. You don't even seem to read my comments completely, or even looked at the utter disaster the review is.
10 = must play
9 - 9.9 = must play
8 - 8.9 = dissapointing and OK
7 - 7.9 = we didn't get paid
0 - 6.9 = it sucks
Even if mystery dungeon happened to be sub-par, (which it isn't, by the way) this score would still be unacceptable. It's way too low to have any kind of credibility.
Completely ignoring features of the new version? Check. Doing good so far!
Are you serious? Have you never heard of type weakness? That certain pokemon have different moves that can be learned? What is wrong with you?!
So... new playable characters.
There's more painfully stupid things that this reviewer said, but I will digress for now. Mostly because I cannot be bothered.
That explains why every EA game I bought last year was improved.
Its more like:
10 = Got paid double and/or had sex with a dev, will call people entitled whiners if hey disagree with it
9-9.9 = Got paid, went to dinner with Dev, didn't get laid, will call people entitled whiners if they disagree
8-8.9 = Got paid, didn't went out with the Dev but at least they invited me to the press party, might call people entitled whiners if i feel like it.
7-7.9 = Cheapskates didn't pay me, but invited me to release party, will not care at this point
6-6.9 = Didn't get paid, didn't get invited to release party, will say its a bad game
5-5.9 = Have to fill my quota to get paid from IGN, least i like the genre
0-4.9 = My Boss insisted on me writing this. I am not in the mood for it, and they still make me do it.
At least all of that is still more complex than user reviews..... 10/10 (Insert crappy joke here) or 0/10 (Insert equally crappy joke here).
Some of the Steam reviews, are actually quite helpful.
If its not your opinion dont read it, actually this "wannabe funny" tables make me laugh.
If IGN scores like that, why people read their articles even more and complaining?
I dont read IGN articles because i trust in German Review Magazines, much better source then any english one hrhr.
You are right...with emphasis on the word 'some'. Most of them are horrible attempts at being funny. Problem is the comedians don't realize that jokes aren't funny when they are repeated 200,000 times.
Well alot of them are Youth, believe it or not, I said "swag" in place of "cool" a few years ago.....in person.
But yeah, jokes don't really help, when you're make a serious decission.