The bizarre amount of celebrities with trans kids

[Robot11024]

Anyone else think the parents are causing it or the schools they're sending their kids to are causing it?

It's definitely an unusual phenomenon because the likelihood of it occurring for so many celebrities doesn't feel natural.

This isn't even all the celebrities, it's just a portion of them:

Cher - Trans son.

Dwyane Wade - Trans daughter.

Jamie Lee Curtis - Trans daughter.

Marcia Gay Harden - Non-binary child, the other is fluid.

Naomi Watts & Liev Schreiber - Two trans children.

Sigourney Weaver - Non-binary child.

Ben Affleck and Jennifer Garner - Trans son.

Jennifer Lopez - Trans son.

Megan Fox - Three children who are either non-binary or trans.

Warren Beatty - Trans son.

Heather Dubrow - Trans son.

Busy Philipps - Trans daughter.

Colin Mochrie - Trans daughter.

Marlon Wayans - Trans son.

David Tennant - Three children who are either non-binary or trans.

Cynthia Nixon - Trans son.

Khary Payton - Trans son.

Angelina Jolie & Brad Pitt - Trans daughter.

Rosie O’Donnell - Non-binary child.

[Nogsec]

A massive minority but certainly not among celebrity children yes you have a point

[Pieshaman]

I only know 7 on the list. most are not even known outside the USA

[Kweeb]

Their parents want attention.

[SEL]

Their parents get attention. Their parents want kinky child attention.

[*ੈ✩‧₊˚༺☆Prinny☆]

i dont pay attention to celebrities on purpose

[Robot11024]

Originally posted by Saturn830:

You're mixing up gender and sex. Gender has come to reference the social aspects that supposedly accompany sex, although the fact that such aspects differ radically over time and place has shown that idea to be bunk. That idea has lead people to believe that those who do no display traits matching their sex are actually something different, which is also bunk. Gender doesn't exist; sex does and should be the only meaning of male, female, or anything else that can be supported through biological evidence.

Stop. The vast majority of people do not believe sex and gender are different. So all you're doing is trying to confuse people about how gender works and then they'll go out into life and have problems because normal people don't think gender works that way. So what's the point in what you're doing?

[Tsubame ⭐]

So? How does that concern you?

Also, there are tons of celebrities. Statistically, this is still a small proportion of the celebrity world, whatever that means.

[SEL]

Theyre trying to get their hands on kinky kids by mucking up legitimate discernment and ignoring facts.

[Andi]

Originally posted by Houseman:

Originally posted by Sir Zyr:

Your own source, which I found on another site[onlinelibrary.wiley.com] with a lot more detail, says that the decrease is "not clinically relevant," and I'm going to trust their word over yours.

Yes, that's what ONE study found. But we don't just say "The question is answered, the science is settled, the matter is resolved" after the findings of just ONE study with a sample size of 25 girls. For instance, what about boys?

This isn't to say more research shouldn't be done, but you're vastly overstating the observed effects.

All I said was "Do puberty blockers also halt the development of the brain? To what extent? Doctors don't know!" I didn't overstate anything.

puberty blockers do not harm children. as Sir Zyr is saying, it's like hitting pause and unpause in a video game. it's not like the whole point of blockers is to mess with your hormones and reroute the body's physical growth, because surely that has no effect on the outcome of a child's physical and mental development. puberty blockers are safe. my peer-reviewed sources on GenderGP say so.

as you can see, these sources prove you wrong. these studies were conducted with good intentions and definitely not to cover up child abuse, because it's not like the people who wrote these studies are the same ones offering such procedures to children.

[Tito Shivan]

Originally posted by Robot11024:

-snip-

I'm old enough as to have listened to that very same rethoric targeting gay people. You've been sold a recycled discourse by the same people who didn't like gay people having rights.

Originally posted by SEL:

-snip-

Another piece of old bigoted rethoric that was used word per word against homosexuals. And now is used to bash trans people.

Originally posted by Robot11024:

Stop. The vast majority of people do not believe sex and gender are different.

You may want to educate yourself in the subject beyond middle-school biology class level.

[Majestic Turkey]

It's just more proof of the power of social contagion, and which minds are most easily parasitized.
https://youtu.be/gbQK8ucIcAw
https://youtu.be/XMng004Cz5M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRBZ0Kjisl4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e898xSzxOhk

The gender word game plays with the vagery of language for the purpose of selling a lie.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpJZnS2lHeM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kapUQicfTGw
The origin of the word is very bad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibd-Y2XDp_s

[Tito Shivan]

And here comes the youtube click farm army to the rescue.

[Robot11024]

Originally posted by Tito Shivan:

I'm old enough as to have listened to that very same rethoric targeting gay people. You've been sold a recycled discourse by the same people who didn't like gay people having rights.

You may want to educate yourself in the subject beyond middle-school biology class level.

Lmfao. Okay, buddy.

Keep on pretending it's not absolutely crazy to go along with an ideology that tells kids they're born in the wrong body (when they're not) or can change gender (they can't). This ideology is so regressive it targets boys with interests deemed feminine by society and then destructively puts an idea in their head that the reason they aren't like typical boys is because they aren't actually a boy at all, they're a girl. I mean, what an absolutely absurd thing to tell a little boy. I just can't even see how you'd side with a group that does that. Do you agree with it?

Also, the fact you need to bring up the gay rights movement to defend this belief when that's a completely different situation to what trans ideology is, is cope.

Brainwashing kids into getting confused about what they are, what's biological reality, and leading them down a medical pathway that probably would've never happened if not for people like you putting this idea in their head, is sickening, blatant lies and child abuse. That's the side of history you're on. And as this entire scandal is slowly dismantled, as it's already started to, I hope you take a long, hard look at yourself in the mirror and reflect on the seriousness of the harm that's been done by this lie.

[Majestic Turkey]

Originally posted by Tito Shivan:

You may want to educate yourself in the subject beyond middle-school biology class level.

But you clearly haven't.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4WV9xv62f4
https://youtu.be/bFPlJSkuf-o
https://youtu.be/5SVbN6tIySc

[Tito Shivan]

Originally posted by Robot11024:

Also, the fact you need to bring up the gay rights movement to defend this belief when that's a completely different situation to what trans ideology is, is cope.

You really don't realise you're parroting the same reasoning homophobes used against homosexuals 30 years ago, do you?

Originally posted by Majestic Turkey:

-snip-

Choo choo here comes the youtube click farm train.