Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
You just braught the same argument 2 times.
But you are right, a review is ALWAYS either subejctive OR advertisment. Im aware that reviews are subjective, but i hate baught scores/reviews. I don't have played them, but im informed about them. Call of Duty, Battlefield 4, ect. get super high scores but are buged, unfinished and borderline unplayable. And most "journalists" slamed games like Serious Sam 3, that was not supportet by a huge PR menagement. I personaly love it and its in my top 10 best games ever.
So i see your point there.
"I don't go by reviews, there are many games that (REVIEWERS have HATED), but (I have LOVED), and there are games that (I LOVE) but (REVIEWERS HATED)."