安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Well, you have to include the books, comics, and video games, which I think Star Wars definitely has better of, on average.
Well, i haven't read any of books set in either universe, so i can't really say. But i will concede that i loved the Knights of the old Republic games. Whilst I can't even remember any of the Star Trek Games (i barely recall a review in a pc magazine a long time ago). I am a bit divided, but i still stand by my first overall estimation. In general Star Trek is better, because it gives more to think about.
Considering there wasn't a good StarTrek movie, just a series of okay ones... its not surprising that there is more hype behind something like Star Wars, which still has 3 outstanding films and 3 films that are so horrible that everyone involved should have their filming license revoked.
So everyone is kinda stoked to see the people again they loved, now that the hack is no longer on board to bring another Ewok and JarJar.
StarTrek, as much as i love it, never had a good movie. It had amazing TV series, but not a single good movie. The first reboot was okay, almost good, but suffered from "rebootitis", where they believe they have to show how to band got together and wasted the majority of the film to that. And the 2nd reboot film had plotholes the size to fit the enterprise sideways.
The first Khan movie (not bothering with the official title), did well and is fondly regarded, but i also bet you that nobody that isn't a die hard StarTrek fan can actually tell you what the plot actually was about. Most people remember that Spok died and that Kirk yelled Khan!
As the same, non fan, people to tell you what the Episode 4-6 of Star Wars was like, and they can tell you the whole plot.
StarWars is just more memorable, and despite their best efforts in making Episode 1 to 3 in an attempt to ruin and bury the franchise, there is some hope that maybe these new ones will not suck, now that they finally took it from Lucas.
Which one is better, for me personally? Neither. StarTrek is the more fleshed out, but also clean and cookie cutter universe. Star Wars, on the other hand, abandoned everything that fleshed it out, making a blanket statement that the expanded universe no longer exists and is only considered to be "legends", so that means right now all we know about Star Wars are 6 movies and the Clone Wars Children show.
Then again StarTrek is Sience Fiction... StarWars is just a Fairytale. I find it unfair to compare the two. They aren't even in the same genre.
That is like asking if you like StarTrek more than Die Hard.
And don't say that the recent retcon means the Star Wars EU doesn't count, because Star Trek recently retconed as well, meaning that Star Wars (six live action movies, one animated movie, two tv series, some books and comics) has more features than Star Trek (two movies).
Star Trek didn't retcon anything. The adventures in the orginal series, films, games, books, etc. still happened and are happening, that was the point with JJ Abrams first Trek. It created a new timeline, but the original still existed. Star Trek Online (which is also considered canon, even though there are now also two branching Star Trek futures between the books and the game) made this explicit as well.
With Star Wars, they just threw out the Expanded Universe and made them "legends".
EDIT: Also, the only appropriate answer to the question is Firefly.
New timeline. Star Trek embraced the "many possible worlds" idea. The original timeline still exists, is still canon, and is still being written about in the novels and in the games.
Well, the same arguement can be made that the old Star Wars continuity still exists, is still canon (just a different canon) and is still being added to (Shadow of Revan, for example).
You can try, but Disney explicitly stated that the Expanded Universe was apocryphal. They're now "legends" and not things that necessarily happened in the "real" Star Wars Universe.
Star Trek, on the other hand, still has everything as canon. Everything is still the "real" Star Trek Universe. The whole manner of the new timeline necessitates it, since its catalyst was TOS Spock and a Romulan forged in a post-Nemesis political landscape going back in time, mucking with everything.