安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
The six Star Wars movies suggest that it's all about one family. Anything beyond that is no longer "real". *shrug*
You also have a very limited view of Star Trek. I suggest reading and watching things about the Mirror Universe and the entirety of DS9 some time.
Still, the only appropriate answer to the question is...Firefly.
I like Star Trek as well but honestly there really are no real similarities between the two other then the fact they both take place in space and on the ground.
Tell that to Disney. Nothing beyond the six movies is "real" any more. The Expanded Universe is now just stuff that maybe happened, maybe didn't. "Legends" told across the universe.
I don't need to. I've been reading the books and comics, playing the games, buying the toys, watching the cartoons since I was a kid. I had Return of the Jedi bedsheets and wallpaper. The problem is that none of the expanded universe is "real" any more. Disney threw it out.
But anyway, the EU is still there. Disney didn't destroy every single EU feature in a big fire. I and anyone who wants to can still enjoy it. It's even still being added to.
And when I say Star Wars VS Star Trek, I mean everything from Star Wars VS everything from Star Trek, not just the two canons.
Yeah, you don't understand. For more than three decades the Expanded Universe was canon. Everything that happened in the comics, the books, the cartoons, etc. were considered as "real" as part of the canon. It was one of the few franchises where everything mattered and everything created a larger, broader universe.
When Disney bought LucasFilm, they changed the rules. Now only the films "count". All the other stories are now just that stories. They no longer happened in the Star Wars Universe, they are just "legends" that may have happened or may have not, they're no longer part of the continuity.
No, you clearly don't. You're welcome to continue your own headcanons all you like, but I'm tired of franchises picking and choosing from an existing continuity and tossing out the rest as things that never happened. I've lived through too many reboots, too many continuity overhauls, through film and comics, that I was very disappointed to see it happen again with Star Wars.
If Disney wants to say it doesn't matter, more power to them. If it doesn't matter to them, Star Wars doesn't matter to me any more.
When did Disney say it doesn't matter?
I loved the old continuity and I still do but it would be physically impossible for it to continue having original stories in that universe forever. They'd eventually "run out of space," chronologically to fit new major events in. And without new major events, they couldn't continue to tell interesting stories. This reboot would have to happen sooner or later for the sake of continuing to tell original, interesting stories.
Also, I don't really have a head cannon. Just the Legends Cannon and the regular cannon, which is what Lucasfilms intends anyway.
I think we're really going offf topic, though. Lets try and bring it back to Trek Vs. Wars.
The answer is still Firefly.
Go back in time and get the creators to name it "Star Firefly" and then it can be part of the debate.
The Serenity appears in the background in one of the scenes in the 2003 Battlestar Galactica mini-series. Likewise, many Star Wars ships were inserted as Easter eggs in the Firefly series. Klingons (Roxann Dawson and Michael Dorn) and Riker (Jonathan Frakes) have been behind things behind-the-scenes on Castle, with a lead character who cosplays as a space cowboy (Nathan Fillion).
Thus, Firefly.
Call me when Star Wars or Star Trek cast Fillion, Gina Torres, Summer Glau, Mark Sheppard, Christina Hendricks, Alan Tudyk, Morena Baccarin, Jewel Staite, Ron Glass, and Sean Maher in something written by Joss Whedon.
IMO both are great, both are classics and both have an interesting universe, but I tend to veer more towards Trek just for the bigger amount of screen time... Expanded universe star wars books can be tough to get through, and usually come in stupidly episodic format.
I plan on catching up on Clone wars, though, when i'm done with the TNG blu-rays
Kudos to B5, dr. Who, Firefly etc.... I try to enjoy as much good sci-fi as I can :)