安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I still think its not fair for majority of the video game consumers
Play games you already own I say.
Meanwhile, my PC can play just about the entire 40+ year back catalog of PC games with a bit of fiddling for some of the older titles. (PC sometimes needs some fiddling and troubleshooting. Just a fact of life. Doesn't bother me.) In fact, I can play 40+ years worth of console games on my PC if I want to. Steam Deck included, if I want it portable.
A general rule of thumb can be that it takes 3 years to make a game, maybe yours is a typo. Of course some games like Cyberpunk 2077 were worked on for 8 years. Four before launch and four after.
And again, as a matter or perspective, it's the added cost of a McDonald's number 9 large, per game, as a point of contention we're talking about here. For a game that will provide a hundred or more hours of enjoyment. Or a thousand in many cases.
I guess if you're buying 30 AAA games a year it adds up, but how many AAA games per year are most Switch users going to buy? Enough to boycott the company for the added cost of two packs of smokes?
Which is why I don't even dabble in 4X games any more, or city builders.