Installer Steam
Logg inn
|
språk
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (tradisjonell kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tsjekkisk)
Dansk (dansk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spania)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latin-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (gresk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (nederlandsk)
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasil)
Română (rumensk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et problem med oversettelse
The Left will have to close the talking head gap if they have any hope in the mid-terms.
This is the kind of rhetoric I'm talking about
Personally, I'd flip the tortoise back over.
The days of technocratic, professiorial policy wonks are long gone. People get their news from memes. If they refuse to move towards a more aggressive, emotion-based approach, then libs and progressives will always have to rely on right-wing mistakes to score only minor victories.
Are you able to actually articulate why you believe what you believe without citing the opposition?
If that were true, then you would've /shrug
This is exactly what I've noticed. The typical Republican can't actually articulate why they believe what they believe without citing a talking head, or "opposition bad!"
However, the typical liberal is capable of this,
Regardless how how radicalised both sides are, and that the uniparty persists in both of them, one is still definitively more well-reasoned, even if still indoctrinated by the uniparty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhaY1hRDYBg&ab_channel=%23myfunnybits
Whereas the right remain highly unified by literally not caring about what Trump says or does.
Sounds like you've seen echo-chamber algorithmic rage-bait shorts content