Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hh7_POC2ueQ
Like the Federal Reserve came into being in 1913... world war one started in 1914. They needed a way to dump the war debt on "the people" to save the corporations from loss.
Make public the loss and private the gains.
WWII - The peace treaty at the end of the war was signed by two blood related brothers.
One each representing the banks of the Axis and Allies.. Both were German.
So, like Trump and the many puppets before him.. Hitler was probably just another puppet to funnel money to the few.
You know, I once saw a picture of Britain looking like a sci-fi, super city. With flying cars and everything. I think it was on Reddit or something. It was all about "What if the Normans never invaded England".
People think things would be way different if that one individual, that ONE degenerate never got into power. People always think that is more likely than that one individual just being one of many. There's a reason why when one political figure dies, the new "Final boss" shows up. Because there's always another waiting to take the opportunity when it comes.
The Normans didn't win because society was prospering (socially I mean. Financially it was rich. But it lacked unity). The took over England because England was a fractured society. Invasion or no, it wasn't an advancing society, and as for Hitler...Hitler was a product of his culture. If he didn't put things in motion, someone else would have.
Hitler wasn’t an idiot, far from it. If you rise from nothing to conquer most of Europe through sheer will, strategy and manipulation, you’re not just some fool stumbling into power; you’re a genius in your own twisted way. But genius doesn’t mean infallible. Hitler’s catastrophic blunder was invading Russia, a decision that overextended his forces, underestimated the terrain and resolve of the Soviets and ultimately shattered his empire.
History shows brilliance can coexist with fatal arrogance.
-a lot of people wouldn't have died
-a lot of my people wouldn't have died
-the quality of my people would be better, because too much good genetics went to waste in a senseless war
-nationalism/identitarianism wouldn't be so taboo and weak people wouldn't be able to just write everyone off as "nazis" if they value themselves
That's pretty much it. Hitler was an idiot and could've settled for just ruling Germany peacefully as the economy repaired itself. However, he and his compatriots were greedy and desired more than what they had. That said, Stalin was worse than Hitler (read your history) and there were no "good guys" in WW2. All the sides were trash, as is often the case.
Most US presidents have been puppets to serve capital and democracies corrupt systems as well. Hitler was funded by Wall Street and the National Socialist Party purged the actual anti-capitalist elements in the party with the Night of the Long Knives.
Hitler wasn't "brilliant" and he was an idiot. His entire rise to power was artificial and stoked by those around him. Without the street work of Rohm and the SA, the NSDAP would've never become so prominent. He had funding from both foreign and domestic interests and was literally only given a year of prison for treason and then up and given the chancellor position to him after being released. He was funneled into power as a tool and did very little by himself in reality. Imagine losing a brutal war and then turning around and agitating for another one, despite the deck being stacked against you. That's nothing but stupidity.
mussolini probably still invade ethiopia
i still think japan is dumb to invade china and soviet union
atomic bomb is delay until 50s
germany become first country to send rocket to space and will have advance in space technology
europe may stay superpower in 21 century
but it doesnt solve soviet economic problem, so i can see soviet become like modern north korea