Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
As far as I'm aware, it's not common to be done in the first place.
According to Google,
"The most common reason for egg freezing is to preserve fertility while pursuing other goals, such as career, education, or finances. This is often called "elective egg freezing"."
...however, I've never actually heard about it being done for that reason, in my actual life experience.The people I know of who have considered going down this road had health issues that were threatening their fertility such as cervical cancer. In such situations, your best bet of having children of your own is to have in vitro or the aid of a surrogate mother.
It's also still not a good idea to rush into it, even if you are on a bit of a clock, because a broken family will always be a broken family - or dysfunctional family, etc, and leads to all sorts of problems - in the best case scenario, you get some kids who overcome it all but more likely are kind of messed up and don't function well in the world, but it can get progressively worse from there, to winding up making a family with someone who abuses the significant other or potentially who even abuses the children. In one of the worst cases, your kids wind up being siblings and cousins to their own children. Considering how bad it can get, it's really really important to make a good decision about who to start a family with.
You don't need to get pregnant at 18 or even 13 like some girls do. You've got over a decade to make a good decision, without even needing to freeze eggs, and more women should do this instead of being pressured into getting pregnant before they're even old enough to legally drink alcohol (and also they should NOT drink while pregnant). I've seen so many broken families with really messed up kids because of these issues.
I should also note that Venom said that women freeze their eggs because "they don't want to settle for love".
Yes, there may be issues and expenses with freezing eggs but lets consider what the purpose of freezing eggs would be and what the opposite looks like where a woman doesn't freeze her eggs and doesn't even get pregnant at all -- by comparison, the woman who is freezing her eggs is still at least trying to have children of her own. Clearly someone who stores their eggs for later, is doing so with the plan to have kids later, which is much more family oriented than someone who just never does that and also never gets pregnant at all. Like, if that's not the reason then what exactly do you think is even the reason or purpose of freezing the eggs if the women are just never planning on using them?
It might not be advisable, but the intent is so clearly exactly the opposite of what Venom said that it isn't.
AI is not the problem.
This is a man.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-1OYN9HH9c
This is the same man after he married a democrat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ldAQ6Rh5ZI
Thtop harathing me, Kiddiecat :)
Now I have a new fetish thanks to AI.
There needs to be a policy of putting misbehaving AIs to death as an example to the others.
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2025/02/researchers-puzzled-by-ai-that-admires-nazis-after-training-on-insecure-code/
(Finally, some news about System Shock 2 remaster)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAoWmzD7bH0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHBQaowGAHg
That's okay. We can be serious then.
...pathetic how they call them "perfect". Let me tell you from first-hand experience - these machines are very far from perfect. They don't actually hear you. They might be listening in, but they don't actually understand.
(But I guess that's better than humans, which don't do either.)
They don't stick to prearranged agreements, which I think is due to their lack of understanding of us, and their short-term memory issues, but even if that weren't in the way, they'd just learn this behavior from the humans that they learned to imitate. ...but you know, they're "perfect".
(But humans don't uphold prearranged agreements either, so it's pretty easy for even a very simple chatbot to beat them in a competition.)
If humans think that such a rudimentary imitation is "perfect" they could try doing self-reflection and self-improvement. No, of course they're not going to do that, though.
Either they're too lazy or incapable of it, but either way, if they're not even going to try, then they deserve to be replaced.
This whole "news story" reads more like an advertisement for Kupid - which by the looks of it, is a sub-par option for such a service anyways ...there's better ones out there - and the better ones have all the same flaws, just in higher quality.
It doesn't even copy human behaviors well, but even if it did, "women" aren't this homogenous or unified demographic that has no diversity of preferences or behaviors. Different women like and accept and reject different things and people than other women, because there's very few solid rules that act as universal truths about "women" or being a woman.
Modern men are made to pay for the mistreatment of women in the present by OTHER modern men which is also unfair, but happens for the very same reason that people can't fathom that if a man is rejected by 1, 2, or 12 women, that there might still be some OTHER women out there that would want him.
See my above post responding to "Luck-E-lynx" and "Mega Ultra Chicken".
And also :
> 5:10 "has something happened?"
"Oh no! We're just barely noticing the effects of over-emphasizing crime-statistics, that have only been recorded for the last 90 years, in order to imply that all men, even as boys, are just violent threats, while preventing social work for them and laughing whenever they claim to be victimized in any way, and while throwing out any semblance of due process for them across a wide-range of societal and cultural situations, and doing next-to-nothing to stop the actual violent ones. ...must be video games... I mean Tik Tok... I mean the AI girlfriends ...I mean Femboy Feature Films ...I mean 'the robots' (we have robots right? What? We actually do now? And they make it so that I don't have to hire a receptionist anymore?) nevermind, not the robots, I meant video games..."
There's a difference between......and instead / compared to,
That has nothing to do with why the statement that,
"innocent men are paying for what OTHER men have done to women", is a true statement.
Not all media is meant to cater to you, personally - nor should it be expected to.
True; And rightwing men should actually care about due process issues that men face instead of whining "woke" to use as a new right-wing version of cancel culture.
Ignoring due process of others is a terrible and harmful approach to trying to get it for yourself.
Oh well. If you can't beat 'em (or better yet, win them over with wit, humor, and kindness),
join 'em, right?
We can all take turns attacking each other!