Charities are the biggest scam in human history

[Cyber2B]

How does 80% of my donation go towards a "non-profit organisation" and only 20% goes to the actual people in need?

[Moogal™]

Agreeable and relatable, i have been a big pro of totally cancelling our "government funded" "charity" organization. I am a member and active withing the conservative christian party of Sweden too btw.

[HermitTheToad]

it's amazing how rich non-for-profits really are.

[Goblin]

the grocery store asking for donations to charity and using your money as a tax write off

dunno, do it yourself? you have more than enough...you have the food, water, money...but you are asking me?

[Xero_Daxter]

Reminds me of a Rabi buying a 50 million dollar jet with the donation money.

[talemore]

The state as example create non-profit jobs.

That means when they distribute the cash everything becomes wages.

The state is non-profit and doesn’t pay any taxes as it has no profits to tax.

It can only obtain more cash if it consume 100% of all resources.

Which is why non-profit means they can't make shareholders richer as the company has no assets of value. It distribute all assets as wages. Then those paid may make private investestments.

But basically it means they not making other countries richer by export your money to another country...

If it even as much make any differences as your charity is how jobs are created.

[76561199811619585]

"non-profit", "fact checkers", "diversity", "inclusive"... do you see it yet?

[Goblin]

Opprinnelig skrevet av ghost:

"non-profit", "fact checkers", "diversity", "inclusive"... do you see it yet?

only one of those words were said in this thread. I see bs

[talemore]

That's why any charity who export money out of the country is a scam.

[76561199811619585]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Goblin:

Opprinnelig skrevet av ghost:

"non-profit", "fact checkers", "diversity", "inclusive"... do you see it yet?

only one of those words were said in this thread. I see bs

I'll take that as a "no".

[Xero_Daxter]

Opprinnelig skrevet av ghost:

"non-profit", "fact checkers", "diversity", "inclusive"... do you see it yet?

What are you even talking about?

[talemore]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Xero_Daxter:

Opprinnelig skrevet av ghost:

"non-profit", "fact checkers", "diversity", "inclusive"... do you see it yet?

What are you even talking about?

States have policies from government to ensure all people in the state are given bon-profit wages as well include everyone in the pay-system.

[talemore]

If people are excluded they can't be given charity. The DEI prevent people getting frozen from assets.

[Ulfrinn]

"Non-profit" but everyone involved earns a fat salary. Non-profit doesn't mean you lose money, but when paying all employees, fees, taxes, etc, the company ideally doesn't have anything left over. However, there's a lot you can write off as a business expense under non-profit, like salaries for example.

So yeah, charities take 90% of what you pay, and put it towards a new house, new car, a yacht, etc for those running them. Not the biggest scam in human history though.

[76561199723811215]

Opprinnelig skrevet av Xero_Daxter:

Opprinnelig skrevet av ghost:

"non-profit", "fact checkers", "diversity", "inclusive"... do you see it yet?

What are you even talking about?

Seems like this is harder to understand for you people than I imagined. The point is: They're smacking these labels onto things to make it seem like they are what they are not. And a disappointing amount of people are easily swayed by this trick. For example, they'll believe "fact checkers" simply because they are called that and will use them as "proof".

[talemore]

Frozen assets means that wages are frozen by either lack of employment or employers.