Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Employees are disposable. There's global competition for jobs and the lowest bidders get jobs.
Neither Capitalism nor Socialism care about the masses. Those in power get what they want and the masses are pawns to advance those that rule.
Your mileage may vary.
And we've had a mysterious housing crisis for decades now?
Probably a coincidence.
wow its like you missed the 80's or never lived in them......Reagan destroyed so much of this country we still cant debate it all
"Useful idiots the subreddit."
Reagonomics is actually a great system, but the elite implemented it incorrectly on purpose to protect themselves and nobody ever caught on
As opposed to what? Price fixing? Heavy taxes and handouts? Socialist this, that, and everything else and somehow expect the rich to stick around and fund it? If you want lower prices, you need competition, and a huge, HUGE portion of the regulations, red tape, taxes, and other road blocks we have now are built up by politicians to protect their friends and interests at the top of the corporate ladder, creating an absence of the healthy competition that keeps prices honest. Too much government is the problem, more of it isn't the solution. "The rich" that deadbeats like Bernie criticized until he became one is a drop in the bucket compared to corruption in federal bureaucracies.