Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
And 'cheating' & 'unfaithful' are other negative limiting labels.
Also typically a moot point: If someone you are involved with gets involved with someone else most of the time you will never know, unless they tell you.
Monogamous mating & dating codes of conduct are impractical, outdated, and unnatural unless the involved peeple both explicitly contractually agree to entertain only each other (such as in the legally binding marriage contract).
Ultimately do what you please as long as nobody gets hurt.
Because currently in society it is frowned upon . . . and that excites some apparently.
If everyone had open relations then there would be no such thing as 'cheating' or 'cuckolds'. Peeple would be living true to their natures instead of imposing artificial constraints.
How about wanting a significant other be happy & safe with or without a mate? Not just as occasional sex furniture or drinking buddies.
Sure. Or participate. Or not. I'm indifferent. It's whateva.
You attract weak men