Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
very easy to 'accidentally' round up 1000 people with undiagnosed memory or brain degredation issues for these kinds of studies.
yeah, typical, all data correction no screening. nice.
As the study says(despite them starting at age 22) it was people with heavy use throughout their lives. This implies that use happened before 22. Most likely in teenage years where the brain is developing the most.
no, being able to use marijuana as a mental health screener would negatively impact false diagnoses resulting in expensive drug regimens. which in turn destabilize an otherwise healthy individual and make them dependent on drug cocktails for the rest of their life.
very doubtful they'd publish such results, if they were true. too much money to lose.
feel free to do your truth; just, y'know, this study is as viable as analyzing the phlegm that comes out of my skull when my subcortical vertibrae pops out of place.
oh I thought they diversified the ages, let me look again...pff, might as well be tracking cortical implant rejection and ram packaging with those age ranges.
well I dunno how to respond to that in a normal way. like how would pharma publishing this cover stuff up to protect?
I mean I guess there's the whole layer of covering up the mass testing of cortical implants and cortical ram...idk though man, that sounds like a pipe dream people are always talking about.
so does it affect her autonomic motor function development, or just her ability to do complex math in axioms which don't verify under rigorous scrutiny?
because most mathemeticians suffer from that second memory issue.
no links to the tests used in the article. just their assurances they were very good, very significant tests.
sure, using weed from age 6 to age 12 and beyond will typically mess you up analytically and leave you struggling to read at a 4th-6th grade level,
but it also massively increases visualization potential. huge dividends in both arts and applied sciences, like engineering or designing a functional bridge.
these are known factors which this study did not account for, and which are the more likely symptoms affecting your friend.
one way to look at this is as a form of brain specialization, something I think we'll be seeing a lot of moving forwards. particularly given the holy trinity of gene editing, eugenics, and cyberization we're seeing unfold.
however, after 18-25 most brain development of this nature has ceased. weed isn't going to do anything after that point. there isn't a lot of statistical evidence establishing this rigorously, but there was some before general studies into cannabis were shut down.
I think.
the vast majority of marijuana studies on memory are actually just alcohol studies with the label changed. very bad science happening back in the day.
but, alcohol's negative effects at all ages and all consumption levels are well established.
so has anyone ever actually repeated this kind of thing about me, and you are dunking on them now, or was it just you messing around the whole time and are now dunking yourself?
I need to know if I am receiving an ally oop or slamming you like some metaphors I should not repeat.
But, to me, smoking marijuana is a huge problem for memory.
I'll never be convinced otherwise. I've seen it first hand across many people.
Maybe non-smoking weed sources aren't as bad, but I know for a fact that smoking weed on a daily basis causes massive memory issues. FACT.