Toate discuțiile > Forumuri Steam > Off Topic > Detaliile subiectului
joco 27 ian. la 11:57
CIA confirms Wuhan lab leak cause of covid
We all (almost all) already knew what was just confirmed.
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1883962337016856782
< >
Se afișează 16-30 din 104 comentarii
AdahnGorion 27 ian. la 12:21 
Postat inițial de Venom:
The next virus will come from Umbrella
I predict this to be next.

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1991377873
#16
abcd 27 ian. la 12:22 
look when it comes down to hiding the fact that a US bioweapon killed milllions of people in the us alone, I'd think the CIA would be on the factual side of the fence in defending itself.

ie it wouldn't reinforce the wuham narrative directly using its own name. it doesn't want to be subjected to a witchunt for supporting a false narrative after the fact.

so I'd appreciate some credibility in regard to whether they are on the list or not.
Editat ultima dată de abcd; 27 ian. la 12:23
#17
Refurbished Cream Cheese 27 ian. la 12:31 
of course it was a GMO used as a bio'weapon for pop.ctrl. purposes.
#18
BR B-263-54 27 ian. la 12:35 
Postat inițial de abcd:
look when it comes down to hiding the fact that a US bioweapon killed milllions of people in the us alone, I'd think the CIA would be on the factual side of the fence in defending itself.

ie it wouldn't reinforce the wuham narrative directly using its own name. it doesn't want to be subjected to a witchunt for supporting a false narrative after the fact.

so I'd appreciate some credibility in regard to whether they are on the list or not.

US bioweapon?

Surely you mean CCP?
#19
abcd 27 ian. la 12:40 
Postat inițial de Juicy Zombie:
of course it was a GMO used as a bio'weapon for pop.ctrl. purposes.

covid is a common carrier vehicle for bioweapons owing to its transmissibility and lack of response measures. the US was experimenting on it same as it does with smallpox, measels, etc, to see what's plausible.

there's a biolab which does such experiments in minnesota, about 50 miles away from a wild game hunting and meat packing plant. I ate an uncured sausage from such a place a few months before covid was spotted.

theoretically the virus would be inactivated, and also not human transmissible. minus my humorously alternative biology.
Editat ultima dată de abcd; 27 ian. la 12:46
#20
HypersleepyNaputunia 27 ian. la 12:41 
No respect for corporate side switchers. Laycin the bed you made zuk
#21
abcd 27 ian. la 12:41 
Postat inițial de BR B-263-54:
Postat inițial de abcd:
look when it comes down to hiding the fact that a US bioweapon killed milllions of people in the us alone, I'd think the CIA would be on the factual side of the fence in defending itself.

ie it wouldn't reinforce the wuham narrative directly using its own name. it doesn't want to be subjected to a witchunt for supporting a false narrative after the fact.

so I'd appreciate some credibility in regard to whether they are on the list or not.

US bioweapon?

Surely you mean CCP?

someone in my neighborhood who worked in the wuhan biolab was visiting and caught a mosquito that had fed off me. they took this live mosquito back to the lab on an overnight flight as a side experiment, then released it same as the pig had been released.

from there the contact tracing is pretty solid, but nobody's ever produced patient zero. the bat was the source of the outbreak, and is no longer available to analyze. But the person who ate it isn't patient zero.

it's been a while now. who'd this thing start in?
Editat ultima dată de abcd; 27 ian. la 12:42
#22
Plaid 27 ian. la 12:42 
Ah, the trustworthy CIA.

We can rest easy knowing they're on the case :winter2019joyfultearssnowman:
Editat ultima dată de Plaid; 27 ian. la 12:42
#23
Fajita Jim 27 ian. la 12:52 
Postat inițial de Immortalis:
Postat inițial de abcd:
that sounds untrue. is there any confirmation of this confirmation, or is citizen free pres fraudulently representing a government agency?

Here's the BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9qjjj4zy5o
But the intelligence agency cautioned it had "low confidence" in this determination. - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9qjjj4zy5o

So basically, this is a 'sure, whatever, maybe.'

So much spin, so many people caught in the whirlpool.
#24
Mina 27 ian. la 12:54 
Another one
#25
abcd 27 ian. la 12:54 
i see. basically "we don't agree but we'll repeat your line"
#26
BR B-263-54 27 ian. la 12:54 
Postat inițial de Fajita Jim:
Postat inițial de Immortalis:

Here's the BBC
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9qjjj4zy5o
But the intelligence agency cautioned it had "low confidence" in this determination. - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9qjjj4zy5o

So basically, this is a 'sure, whatever, maybe.'

So much spin, so many people caught in the whirlpool.

Alongside other theories, there is little evidence to definitively stand by any conclusion.

The CCP isn't going to be honest about it and they effectively strong armed the World Health Organisation to cover up for them.
#27
Fajita Jim 27 ian. la 12:59 
Postat inițial de BR B-263-54:
Postat inițial de Fajita Jim:
But the intelligence agency cautioned it had "low confidence" in this determination. - https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9qjjj4zy5o

So basically, this is a 'sure, whatever, maybe.'

So much spin, so many people caught in the whirlpool.

Alongside other theories, there is little evidence to definitively stand by any conclusion.

The CCP isn't going to be honest about it and they effectively strong armed the World Health Organisation to cover up for them.

Wonder where OP et al were when the CIA was supporting the Wet Market theory with 'low confidence'? Not on that choo choo train, I bet.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66005240

It noted most US intelligence agencies agree the virus was not genetically engineered or "laboratory-adapted".
#28
MinionJoe 27 ian. la 13:03 
Postat inițial de BR B-263-54:
Postat inițial de abcd:
look when it comes down to hiding the fact that a US bioweapon killed milllions of people in the us alone, I'd think the CIA would be on the factual side of the fence in defending itself.

ie it wouldn't reinforce the wuham narrative directly using its own name. it doesn't want to be subjected to a witchunt for supporting a false narrative after the fact.

so I'd appreciate some credibility in regard to whether they are on the list or not.

US bioweapon?

Surely you mean CCP?
Why would the U.S. fund a CCP bioweapon?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/nih-official-finally-admits-taxpayers-funded-gain-of-function-research-in-wuhan-after-years-of-denials/ar-BB1mwcLr
#29
BR B-263-54 27 ian. la 13:03 
Postat inițial de Fajita Jim:
Postat inițial de BR B-263-54:

Alongside other theories, there is little evidence to definitively stand by any conclusion.

The CCP isn't going to be honest about it and they effectively strong armed the World Health Organisation to cover up for them.

Wonder where OP et al were when the CIA was supporting the Wet Market theory with 'low confidence'? Not on that choo choo train, I bet.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66005240

It noted most US intelligence agencies agree the virus was not genetically engineered or "laboratory-adapted".

I think you're a little out of date.

The US house committee agreed the virus likely came from a lab.

https://www.science.org/content/article/house-panel-concludes-covid-19-pandemic-came-lab-leak

The US also shared compelling evidence with British officials stating the same.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/04/us-shared-gobsmacking-lab-leak-evidence-with-uk-pandemic/
#30
< >
Se afișează 16-30 din 104 comentarii
Per pagină: 1530 50

Toate discuțiile > Forumuri Steam > Off Topic > Detaliile subiectului
Data postării: 27 ian. la 11:57
Postări: 104
Începe o discuție nouă

Reguli și ghiduri pentru discuții