Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1991377873
ie it wouldn't reinforce the wuham narrative directly using its own name. it doesn't want to be subjected to a witchunt for supporting a false narrative after the fact.
so I'd appreciate some credibility in regard to whether they are on the list or not.
US bioweapon?
Surely you mean CCP?
covid is a common carrier vehicle for bioweapons owing to its transmissibility and lack of response measures. the US was experimenting on it same as it does with smallpox, measels, etc, to see what's plausible.
there's a biolab which does such experiments in minnesota, about 50 miles away from a wild game hunting and meat packing plant. I ate an uncured sausage from such a place a few months before covid was spotted.
theoretically the virus would be inactivated, and also not human transmissible. minus my humorously alternative biology.
someone in my neighborhood who worked in the wuhan biolab was visiting and caught a mosquito that had fed off me. they took this live mosquito back to the lab on an overnight flight as a side experiment, then released it same as the pig had been released.
from there the contact tracing is pretty solid, but nobody's ever produced patient zero. the bat was the source of the outbreak, and is no longer available to analyze. But the person who ate it isn't patient zero.
it's been a while now. who'd this thing start in?
We can rest easy knowing they're on the case
So basically, this is a 'sure, whatever, maybe.'
So much spin, so many people caught in the whirlpool.
Alongside other theories, there is little evidence to definitively stand by any conclusion.
The CCP isn't going to be honest about it and they effectively strong armed the World Health Organisation to cover up for them.
Wonder where OP et al were when the CIA was supporting the Wet Market theory with 'low confidence'? Not on that choo choo train, I bet.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66005240
It noted most US intelligence agencies agree the virus was not genetically engineered or "laboratory-adapted".
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/nih-official-finally-admits-taxpayers-funded-gain-of-function-research-in-wuhan-after-years-of-denials/ar-BB1mwcLr
I think you're a little out of date.
The US house committee agreed the virus likely came from a lab.
https://www.science.org/content/article/house-panel-concludes-covid-19-pandemic-came-lab-leak
The US also shared compelling evidence with British officials stating the same.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/05/04/us-shared-gobsmacking-lab-leak-evidence-with-uk-pandemic/