Tutte le discussioni > Discussioni di Steam > Off Topic > Dettagli della discussione
Marvel Rivals designs trigger woke snowflakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHHNabitAc4

It's not okay for a game skin to be revealing, but a woman in real life can dress themselves to be revealing. Make this make sense.
Ultima modifica da Mega Ultra Chicken; 8 gen, ore 20:45
< >
Visualizzazione di 46-60 commenti su 61
Messaggio originale di Falco:
"Jeepers creepers fellas, this game is anatomically incorrect and racist and ageist and sexist and gameist in it's depiction of women!"



This whole argument about the character design being sexualized and jacked up (specifically for a male audience) is a load of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

Yeah, the women get a lot of focus, sure, but jesus ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ christ have they seen the men? It's like a Rob Liefeld drawing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Liefeld


If it was predominately women, they might've had a slight argument, but instead, this hasn't happened. In fact, I'd argue Marvel Rivals has some of the best character design in a while, simply because it looks like a Rob Liefeld drawing, and because everyone is absolutely ripped.
Going to bet that if you tell someone that they look like a Marvel Rivals character, they'd take it as a compliment. But comparisons to Concord characters would be taken as an insult.
Messaggio originale di Nargo:
Messaggio originale di Falco:
"Jeepers creepers fellas, this game is anatomically incorrect and racist and ageist and sexist and gameist in it's depiction of women!"



This whole argument about the character design being sexualized and jacked up (specifically for a male audience) is a load of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

Yeah, the women get a lot of focus, sure, but jesus ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ christ have they seen the men? It's like a Rob Liefeld drawing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rob_Liefeld


If it was predominately women, they might've had a slight argument, but instead, this hasn't happened. In fact, I'd argue Marvel Rivals has some of the best character design in a while, simply because it looks like a Rob Liefeld drawing, and because everyone is absolutely ripped.
Going to bet that if you tell someone that they look like a Marvel Rivals character, they'd take it as a compliment. But comparisons to Concord characters would be taken as an insult.
I'm going to bet many people wouldn't know what you're talking about.
Personally I'd have a hard time figuring it out too, what with the insane amount of Marvel Everything that we've been subjected to the last 10 years.

Make it stop.

Do you people really give a ♥♥♥♥ about this game? I mean, beyond that it's putting it's thumb in the woke face.
Ultima modifica da Plaid; 9 gen, ore 14:37
People have forgotten that comic book heroes have been a thing for...oh I don't know years.
Messaggio originale di Midnight Carnival Snack:
Messaggio originale di Nargo:
That... is exactly what the oversaturated argument is about.
Oversaturated means there's a lot of competition. If a product does not stand out, it fails.
You've just reiterated what they've been saying from the start.
Despite that, people argue that the market being oversaturated is just an excuse since Marvel Rivals released into that same oversaturated market but is successful, thus people look at it and claim it's because the game isn't woke or whatever.

So explaining it in more detail is necessary as simply saying these games released in an oversaturated market alone doesn't say what people need to actually hear.

I should have said "half explaining" instead of "half understanding" though.
The issue is that the people defending Concord are not looking for the truth. They don't are about the explanations, and as such, it would fall on deaf ears. So spending the time explaining it, would be wasted.

That's why I usually do not spend any time explaining it unless someone else first engages with the point. If they are willing to engage with the point, then they might also be willing to listen to the justifications behind it. I just want to see that willingness first.

And the modern woke movement is basically just the next step of political correctness. Making everything bland, sterile, and uninteresting is their goal. You remove all the flavor so that it isn't likely to offend anyone. That's what Concord did. That is why it was unappealing, and that was why it flopped.
why would a woman fight in a skimpy outfit like that anyway?

I guess it would distract the enemy lolololol
Messaggio originale di Banned 3x for SILLY names :P:
why would a woman fight in a skimpy outfit like that anyway?

I guess it would distract the enemy lolololol
Roman Gladiators fought nude.
Messaggio originale di D. Flame:
[
The issue is that the people defending Concord are not looking for the truth.
Okay but, like, who the ♥♥♥♥ is defending Concord? Like I said:
Messaggio originale di Midnight Carnival Snack:
If anti woke people weren't constantly bringing it up, it would have been forgotten ages ago outside of secret level reminding everyone it existed for 5 minutes.
The only time people as a whole thought about Concord where during four key points: announcement, release, shutdown, secret level episode.

Obviously, yes, there are people out there who were fans of the game. But we all know how miniscule the player count is so the pool of people that did end up becoming fans is even smaller, doubling everything to account for consoles.

Point is I don't think there's enough Concord fans in existence for any conduct from them, good or bad, to matter.
Messaggio originale di Midnight Carnival Snack:
Messaggio originale di D. Flame:
[
The issue is that the people defending Concord are not looking for the truth.
Okay but, like, who the ♥♥♥♥ is defending Concord?
Everyone that says, "It was a fine game, and it only failed because the market is over saturated."
Messaggio originale di D. Flame:
Messaggio originale di Midnight Carnival Snack:
Okay but, like, who the ♥♥♥♥ is defending Concord?
Everyone that says, "It was a fine game, and it only failed because the market is over saturated."
Is it fine as in "it's good, actually" or is it fine as in "it's okay, I guess"?
Ultima modifica da Midnight Sky ✨🌙✨; 10 gen, ore 1:20
Actually I'm making my point so I can stop posting for now: I think you're interpreting a more positive reception than what the game actually got.
Ultima modifica da Midnight Sky ✨🌙✨; 10 gen, ore 1:28
Messaggio originale di Midnight Carnival Snack:
Messaggio originale di D. Flame:
Everyone that says, "It was a fine game, and it only failed because the market is over saturated."
Is it fine as in "it's good, actually" or is it fine as in "it's okay, I guess"?
Either or.

In both cases, it is defending a objective failure of a game.
Why do people still keep falling for those artificially created controversies and grifter galore youtube channels?
Ultima modifica da Bagel; 10 gen, ore 1:43
Messaggio originale di Donut:
Why do people still keep falling for those artificially created controversies and grifter galore youtube channels?
Because every guy that tries to express their sexuality gets called a gooner.
Messaggio originale di Mega Ultra Chicken:
Messaggio originale di Donut:
Why do people still keep falling for those artificially created controversies and grifter galore youtube channels?
Because every guy that tries to express their sexuality gets called a gooner.
:steammocking: LMFAO
< >
Visualizzazione di 46-60 commenti su 61
Per pagina: 1530 50

Tutte le discussioni > Discussioni di Steam > Off Topic > Dettagli della discussione
Data di pubblicazione: 8 gen, ore 20:43
Messaggi: 61